Sign up for Email Updates

Posted December 20th, 2008 by Michael Airhart

Citing past donations allegedly made by failed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to pro-equality groups, the antigay parents and spouses group P-FOX on Thursday publicly — and quite seriously — demanded a share of federal bailout money.

In better economic times, the mortgage giants provided aid to countless special interests — liberal and conservative — in order to promote stable homes, foster care and adoption, and youth development. Now the agencies are being bailed out by U.S. taxpayers.

P-FOX offers no home, family, or youth services — in fact, it offers no services at all. The tiny and secretive organization’s annual budget averages less than $30,000. P-FOX refuses to identify its board members (though Family Research Council executive Peter Sprigg is known to have been one of them). P-FOX offers no membership benefits. Yet it is marketed by its few supporters as a group with growing membership (actual numbers are never disclosed) due to “thousands” of ex-gays who leave homosexuality “daily.”

P-FOX destabilizes families by encouraging mothers to harass, stigmatize, and ostracize not only their gay teen-age and adult son, but often the father who is recklessly blamed for a son’s homosexuality. P-FOX opposes granting children access to foster care and adoption at a time when many foster and adoptive parents are single or gay, and few two-parent heterosexual households are willing to accept minority or troubled children. Instead of giving children good homes, P-FOX persistently attempts to halt popular youth-development and comprehensive sex-education programs in Maryland and Virginia public schools.

According to Thursday’s press release,

Regina Griggs, executive director of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX), stated, “We support individuals’ rights to self-determination. We support families who have homosexual loved ones. We support those who have come out of homosexuality. We provide outreach and educate teens on same-sex attractions.”

To Freddie and Fannie, Griggs says, “We would like equal money. We want the same financial opportunity that gay groups enjoy.”

The first paragraph is blatantly inaccurate.

Since 1996, I have observed P-FOX supporting antigay discrimination, opposing factual sex-education and balanced presentations of religious viewpoints regarding homosexuality, and opposing legislative action against antigay murders and violent assaults.

  • These activities do not, in any sane or logical fashion, qualify as support for “individuals’ rights to self-determination.” P-FOX redefines “self-determination” in terms of the ex-gay myth that people can choose their sexual orientation at any time. P-FOX supports a choice to deny and suppress one’s orientation, but not a choice to be sexually and spiritually honest.
  • Furthermore, P-FOX’s online parental discussion groups regrettably do not “support families who have homosexual loved ones.” Despite criticism and high turnover, these e-mail and web-based forums cheer parents who angrily blame their spouses and schools — both for the fact that their teen and adult children are gay, and for the failure of ex-gay tactics to “change” sexual orientation.
  • P-FOX offers no measurable support to “those who have come out of homosexuality.” That chore is handled (poorly, given its political distractions) by Exodus International.
  • P-FOX does not “educate teens on same-sex attractions.” P-FOX tells teen-agers that their peers choose to be immoral, misinforms teen-agers about the pre-natal and early-life factors that determine sexual orientation, and warns antigay teen-agers and faculty that allowing any freedom of speech among gay teen-agers — or opposing bullying that specifically targets gay teen-agers — threatens their own freedom.
Tags: , , ,

6 Comments »

  1. Why don’t they simply offer PFOX what they are worth?

    A cheque for $0.00 is coming Regina’s way.

    Comment by grantdale — December 20, 2008 @ 4:15 pm

  2. In my view, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were used for years by Democrats and Republicans to buy votes by giving out loans that could not be repaid. Now PFOX wants to have its vote bought, while Republicans still run the White House.

    Comment by Michael Airhart — December 20, 2008 @ 5:36 pm

  3. Regina Griggs is such a greedy little piggy that she misunderstood the key word:

    It’s “bailout”, NOT “handout”.

    As many comparisons the “ex-gays” have for gay people (“murderers”, “pedophiles”, etc.), I have one for them:

    Welfare queens.

    Regina, honey – there’s more to life than hating on gay people, and demanding freebies every step of the way.

    Comment by Scott — December 20, 2008 @ 5:38 pm

  4. It seems to me that PFOX would be better off pushing Congress for universal health care, since it is clear that the people involved with this uniquely bizarre and vindictive organization need round-the-clock, on-call shrinks.

    Comment by Wayne Besen — December 20, 2008 @ 9:58 pm

  5. What I’d like to know is what exactly are “reparative therapists” going to do when the “reparative therapy” industry goes out of business?

    I mean, “ex gays” are either straight people who thought they were gay for a short time, or they are still gay and their sexual orientation has been repressed.

    Eventually, the truth about reparative therapy will be exposed for all to see and they will have no support. Obama certainly will not fund them like Bush did. The truth will be given to all of the supporters who donate to them, and thus, the “reparative therapy” industry goes out of business.

    If that happens, then what will the reparative therapists do? I’m sure having “reparative therapist” on your resume won’t look too hot, so their may be no hope in getting another job, so what are they gonna do?

    Perhaps karma will answer that!
    :)

    Comment by James — December 27, 2008 @ 6:57 pm

  6. James,

    “Ex-gay therapists” have no such degree, so there will have to be a crackdown on quack doctors. There NEEDS to be a crackdown.

    Who’s to say some of these uneducated quacks might land a position to be working on your lungs, heart or brain.

    As far as I care, about 90% of these so-called “honorary degrees” should be revoked as well. In most cases, those are just freebies for lunatics.

    Comment by Scott — December 27, 2008 @ 9:25 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment