Comments on: D.C. Councilmen Discredit PFOX’s Antigay ‘Dr. Ruth’ http://www.truthwinsout.org/blog/2009/11/4563/ TruthWinsOut.org is a non-profit organization that counters right wing propaganda, exposes the “ex-gay” myth and educates America about gay life. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:54:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Break the Terror (Evan) http://www.truthwinsout.org/blog/2009/11/4563/comment-page-1/#comment-14566 Break the Terror (Evan) Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:39:07 +0000 http://www.truthwinsout.org/?p=4563#comment-14566 I know this is serious, but I cannot stop laughing. She is just too crazy for me to keep a straight face. I know this is serious, but I cannot stop laughing.

She is just too crazy for me to keep a straight face.

]]> By: Tim http://www.truthwinsout.org/blog/2009/11/4563/comment-page-1/#comment-14553 Tim Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:22:04 +0000 http://www.truthwinsout.org/?p=4563#comment-14553 You know, one thing that troubles me about these arguments and arguments against safe sex education in the first place is the assumption that sex education leads to an increase in sexual practice; in much the same way that the argument is given that with the passage of laws providing equality for gays would come an increase in homosexuals or homosexual sexual activity. Perhaps the most troubling is her reasoning. According to her testimony, anal sex demonstrates an increased risk of transmission over vaginal sex. Why then wouldn’t she want anal sex included in the safe sex practices portion of sex education classes? Does it matter in terms of transmissibility if the person in the receptive role during anal sex is female or male? If her primary objective truly is the reduction of HIV transmission, wouldn’t she want the majority population of sexually active heterosexuals to be aware of this risk? Bizarre. You know, one thing that troubles me about these arguments and arguments against safe sex education in the first place is the assumption that sex education leads to an increase in sexual practice; in much the same way that the argument is given that with the passage of laws providing equality for gays would come an increase in homosexuals or homosexual sexual activity.

Perhaps the most troubling is her reasoning. According to her testimony, anal sex demonstrates an increased risk of transmission over vaginal sex. Why then wouldn’t she want anal sex included in the safe sex practices portion of sex education classes? Does it matter in terms of transmissibility if the person in the receptive role during anal sex is female or male? If her primary objective truly is the reduction of HIV transmission, wouldn’t she want the majority population of sexually active heterosexuals to be aware of this risk? Bizarre.

]]> By: Wayne Besen http://www.truthwinsout.org/blog/2009/11/4563/comment-page-1/#comment-14544 Wayne Besen Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:31:25 +0000 http://www.truthwinsout.org/?p=4563#comment-14544 Yes, she seems mentally and emotionally disturbed and completely unaware that many heterosexuals enjoy anal sex. Yes, she seems mentally and emotionally disturbed and completely unaware that many heterosexuals enjoy anal sex.

]]> By: David Roberts http://www.truthwinsout.org/blog/2009/11/4563/comment-page-1/#comment-14537 David Roberts Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:51:48 +0000 http://www.truthwinsout.org/?p=4563#comment-14537 Subject matter aside, there is something not quite right about that woman. Does she actually have a practice? At least she is on the PFOX side of things - no threat of her being taken seriously. Subject matter aside, there is something not quite right about that woman. Does she actually have a practice? At least she is on the PFOX side of things – no threat of her being taken seriously.

]]>