Porno Pete LaBarbera is the voyeuristic anti-gay “activist” who clownishly videotapes gay leather events and bathhouses year-after-year as part of his hands on research. His ostensible goal is to “expose” the real gay agenda. Although, his bizarre obsession with entering this arena reveals more about his own sexual repression that the GLBT community. I mean, what kind of straight dude needs to repeatedly take the same photos each year?
Memo to Porno Pete: Assless chaps look the same in 1993 as they do in 2009. So, there is really no excuse why you return to these events so often unless you are deriving some form of titillating pleasure from the manufactured situation.
Porno Pete’s latest issue is ensuring a gay conservative group, GOProud can’t sponsor the annual CPAC conference. In his opposition, LaBarbera attributed a quote to Liberty Counsel’s Matt Barber:
“What is conservatism?” asks Porno Pete.
It boils down to this: there is nothing “conservative” about ‚Äî as Barber inimitably puts it ‚Äî “one man violently cramming his penis into another man’ lower intestine and calling it “love.’” Or two women awkwardly mimicking natural procreative relations or raising a child together in an intentionally fatherless home. This does not mean that people practicing those and other immoral (andchangeable) behaviors cannot think and act conservatively on other issues like lowering taxes, cutting government spending, ending abortion, etc. But let’ be honest: the “proud” in GOProud is not about pride in opposing the death tax, or defending the right to bear arms; it’ about proudly embracing sinful homosexual behavior — and that is hardly a conservative value.
Yesterday, Liberty Counsel called LaBarbera a liar and claimed Barber never said such a detestible thing.
“Neither Matt Barber nor anyone with Liberty Counsel wrote or made any such public statement that is being alleged in this blog. Liberty Counsel promotes the traditional family of one man and one woman because we believe that such relationships are best for society and for children. While we strongly disagree with the sexual politics and agenda of activist organizations and individuals, we also believe that each person is entitled to respect. While there are some that hate us because of our message of sexual integrity, redemption, change, and hope, we have never, and will never, confuse the person with the agenda. We have never sought to dehumanize people to promote our message. Our message is one of redemption through the power of Jesus Christ.”
I’m not sure who to believe, as Porno Pete and Barber are both sexually immature, shady characters who hold outlandish views. But, I do know that one of them is not telling the truth. In any case, it is fun to watch them turn on each other.
Related posts
18 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
“one man violently cramming his penis into another man’ lower intestine and calling it “love.’”
Speak for yourself Petey. I like it nice and slow with lots and lots of tender loving care. And lube.
Not everyone is into the rough sex like you are Peter.
Comment by Eshto — December 19, 2009 @ 12:11 pm
Oh sorry I guess technically Barber said that?
I’m getting these two perverts confused with each other.
Comment by Eshto — December 19, 2009 @ 12:15 pm
LaBarbera and Barber offer no objections to men who “violently cram their penises into a woman’s vagina.”
Ugh.
Comment by Michael Airhart — December 19, 2009 @ 12:17 pm
I interpret Barber’s comment as a request for Peter to be more gentle next time.
Bam-Bam’s obsession with gay sex, and his warped interpretation of it, is so disturbing.
Perhaps none of his male lovers have treated him with the respect a failed insurance agent/boxer of mediocre intelligence and writing skills so obviously deserves.
Comment by Evan Hurst — December 19, 2009 @ 12:25 pm
I’ve always thought that Labarbera is warped–this just proves it.
Petey, what my spouse and I do in the privacy of the marital bed is: a)not an imitation of anything–it is an outgrowth of the love we feel for each other (yeah, asshat, it’s love, ‘kay?) and b) it’s none of your goddamned business.
I can’t wait for the day that Porno Pete is exposed as the warped perv he is for all the world to see.
Comment by Merlyn — December 19, 2009 @ 8:23 pm
One liar saying that another liar lied about something he said. Hmmm. Without audiotapes or email records, it seems like a draw to me.
Comment by John — December 19, 2009 @ 9:43 pm
Good point, John. Not a very trustworthy bunch.
Comment by Wayne Besen — December 19, 2009 @ 11:52 pm
Sure, sex can be “awkward”.. But it can also be loving and a beautiful act between caring people.
Look, everybody can find certain sex acts gross. It’s ok to own your turn-offs. But these people are just obsessing over it. They just see nothing beyond (ONLY ONE KIND OF) gay (MALE) sex. Not all male couples have sex the same way. Ditto for female couples, though I have a feeling they have a much harder time imagining how we do so.
And do these guys think love=hetero-sex? Because it obviously doesn’t. So why would love=homo-sex? Love is love and sometimes sex comes into play as a result of it, or sometimes there is sex devoid of love. Or sometimes people can express love without having sex as a part of it. Do they really think that romantic love, such a complex emotion, can be boiled down to sex?? Are any of these guys married or even have girlfriends? If so, I pity them.
Comment by Emily K — December 20, 2009 @ 12:13 am
There is no sexual acts which gay people do which are not also engaged in by those choosing the heterosexual lifestyle. If anal or oral sex were the real issues, radical anti-gay activists would be condemning these practices all around. The fact that they only mention them in the context of gay taxpayers shows their real concern is promoting homophobia. Since homophobia is a in like lying, stealing and murder, their message has nothing whatsoever to do with Christ. Christ doesn’t sin.
Comment by Michael — December 20, 2009 @ 7:04 am
Well, to be fair, The Peter DOES talk about butt sex being naughty all around, on occasion. The Peter doesn’t seem to like sexual expression that doesn’t fit within narrow confines that he surely didn’t find in the Bible.
Comment by Evan Hurst — December 20, 2009 @ 1:26 pm
His poor wife. What is she to think as he leaves the family back at the farm – yet again – while he traipses off to bathhouses and S&M events?
Imagine being married to man known to the world as “Porno Pete”…kind if tragic, really. If he is ever caught dabbling in his research, no one can say that Mrs. Porno wasn’t warned.
Comment by Wayne Besen — December 20, 2009 @ 2:04 pm
In the world where the LaBarberas reside, I would imagine that Mrs. Porno has been taught not to think.
Comment by Evan Hurst — December 20, 2009 @ 2:46 pm
That’s right, Evan. I almost forgot that the Southern Baptist Convention demands that women submit graciously to the lordship of the husband. That would explain how his wife puts up with such peculiar behavior.
Comment by Wayne Besen — December 20, 2009 @ 3:56 pm
Lordship.
Sounds kinky.
Comment by Evan Hurst — December 20, 2009 @ 5:36 pm
folks – here is the good news. Peter Labarbera is finally starting to self destruct. He just can’t control his impulses any longer and I knew the day would come when he would be discovered for who he really is. This is an example of how he is getting dirtier and more vulgar on his supposed “born again” blog which has the purpose of getting gays to go straight. He is currently going tit for tat with Exodus.com leader and publishing his witty rebuttals on his website. As most readers of Labarbera’s blog know, he has to share with the world any email he writes to others because he needs so much attention. Peter has proven time and again that he is not christian by any means and he is starting to show it. This is not the love of God (would his blog convert any of you?) This is the ego of Peter L. turning on him. He also is trying to bring Matt Barber along for the ride but when Matt B. was confronted by his boss, he turned on Peter in two seconds to save his job and denied his comments. How cowardly of him. (Simon Peter)
Also people…one more thing – what was so cool was this quote from Matt Staver. “We have never sought to dehumanize people to promote our message. Our message is one of redemption through the power of Jesus Christ.” I know he doesn’t like gay agenda but at least he is not willing to go as low as porno pete.
Also – imagine the nerve of Peter to equate male on male, or female on female sex with love. That is not what any relationship is about but that is what Porno Pete wants to do. I believe he thinks this is how he can win which is to say that he thinks that if he can make people visualize a penis in the rectum, then that is the end of gays. Well guess what…..I don’t want to picture Peter’s male on female penis in anyones mouth, vagina, or rectum.
comments?
Comment by Reno — December 20, 2009 @ 11:48 pm
Can you imagine PP and his missus in a social situation?
This is my husband, Pete.
Why thank you, I’d love another rumaki.
For a living? Pete?
Um, well, uh, he follows homosexuals around, takes pictures and writes about it on the internet.
Comment by Mike Tidmus — December 21, 2009 @ 12:23 am
[...] into this mix is radical gay activist Wayne Besen who never misses a chance to jump on LaBarbera, lavishly calling him “Porno Pete” and [...]
Pingback by Christian Blogosphere Burning Up Over Bold Descriptions of Homosexual Sodomy | ChristWire — January 6, 2010 @ 7:20 pm
[...] her own devious mind and she realized that she fucked up. (Or maybe she’s been talking to Porno Pete ‚Äî it’s right up his “alley”) ‚Äî She MADE the SHIT UP to scare people and [...]
Pingback by Lying Bag of Excrement Nancy Elliot (R) NH « Reality Bong — February 17, 2010 @ 8:06 pm