With all of Buh’s mountain biking and brush clearing, he hardly had time to read about threats from a group that he could not pronounce.

I made fun of the people who are hiding under their beds in fear because some geek failed to explode his underpants properly, yes.

Let’s review how many successful al Qaeda attacks happened on Bush’s watch: Well, there was that HUGE one. Perhaps you forgot. But with Obama, there was the geek who tried to blow up his panties and failed. You’re right, that’s worse. Also, let’s see…Bush started a war with people who did NOT attack us, while releasing detainees into Yemen who went back to the fight with al Qaeda in…um…oh, yeah, YEMEN. Meanwhile Bush was making boom boom in Iraq. So, um…yeah.

I don’t know what metric you’re judging in saying that Bush did better than Obama on national security, since by this point in Bush’s presidency, 3500 Americans had been killed in New York City and at the Pentagon. Perhaps “Lefties” like me just take national security seriously enough that we’re willing to do basic math.

Also, the Senate bill, if you haven’t noticed, is actually a giveaway to big insurance. But I’ve read it, and I doubt you have.

And when I said look at the home page, I meant click to the first entry on the blog. Find that. Get back to me.

And good morning!

Both House and Senate have passed bills giving the government immense and unconstitutional power in health care.

And as for Al Qaeda, Bush’s defeating or not defeating them is irrelevant for this discussion, but he did a better job fighting them than his successor has done so far. As the whole world knows.

You really have a fat lot of nerve raising questions about Bush’s record against Al Qaeda after making fun of people for being alarmed by yet another attempt to destroy an airliner. Perhaps if lefties like you could learn to take matters like national security seriously, your constant whining about how the state won’t validate your identity would be easier to take. Perhaps.

I looked at your blessed home page. There is nothing there that answers my question. So I take it you have no answer other than your reflexive dislike for all things non-leftist.

Did I miss something? Did George W. Bush defeat al Qaeda?

Catch me up!

Just because you think socialized medicine is fine-and-dandy and enjoy presuming upon the safety of the country doesn’t mean that GOProud has to.

If they’re conservatives why shouldn’t they participate in CPAC or any other conservative event?

You’re a typical leftist, Evan: You scream about compassion (the absurd comment about health care being white) but reveal yourself as bitter and selfish (why don’t gay Republicans focus on being gay rather than on being Americans) at the most minute provocation. Loser.

The group reemphasized its enthusiasm for the death penalty in an article relating to Uganda. Will LU be sponsoring them again this year?

http://blog.au.org/2010/01/12/hate-monger-religious-right-activist-says-hate-the-sin-and-hate-the-sinner-too-2/

Equally, why on earth does GOProud want to be seen dead in the same hall as LU?