Because they don’t know where she is.


How bizarre.

Kyle at Right Wing Watch adds:

Correct me if I’m wrong, but that sort of ruling doesn’t seem to provide much incentive for people to abide by court orders now does it? In fact, it sort of seems to do exactly the opposite.

Why does the judge need her specific location in order to hold her in contempt? You know where she isn’t? His courtroom, where she’s supposed to have appeared.