Comments on: Ryan Sorba’s Poorly Researched Book Shows He Is Not Ready For Prime Time

By: error

error — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:07:51 +0000

Flash graphic says “Roy Sorba”

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:00:30 +0000

“So, does anyone suspect that Mr. Sorba might be gay himself?”

RAGING homo of a clown.

By: Paul Mc

Paul Mc — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:03:29 +0000

Thanks for the link. It has cheered me up immensely. What a laugh…. he says at one point that “sometimes people develop same sex attractions due to lack of attention”. So, I wasn’t concentrating at 11-3 and suddenly liked boys? Or nobody would talk to me so I became gay? LOL LOL LOL

By: Joseph

Joseph — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:19:43 +0000

So, does anyone suspect that Mr. Sorba might be gay himself?

By: Mike Airhart

Mike Airhart — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:50:52 +0000

FYI, Randy Thomas believes in the six-day creation myth.

By: Gyeong Hwa Pak

Gyeong Hwa Pak — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:46:42 +0000

William,

There’s a faction of them that still think the earth is flat (see Flat Earth Society on Wikipedia). That’s how disconnected they are with science.

By: William

William — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:41:14 +0000

So NARTH also are in on this “Intelligent Design” lark, are they?

I wonder what other hidden links there are between these various groups of cranks. I know that, incredible as it may seem, some who believe in so-called Creation Science also believe that Copernicus and Galileo got it wrong, and that the earth is the centre of our universe. See:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/ce/2/part3.html

By: Gyeong Hwa Pak

Gyeong Hwa Pak — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:05:21 +0000

All the more reason not to trust those organization. If they truly did any science, there wouldn’t an obvious Christian bias in their “research”. Support for homosexuality and evolution, OTOH, is found by people of all/no faith including Christians.

By: adrianT

adrianT — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:23:20 +0000

Indeed not surprising – so is NARTH http://www.narth.com/docs/reflection.html and FOTF has poured millions into ID ‘research’. The point being, if you believe in Creationism, you do not and cannot believe or understand genetics in the first place. Or understand science, or the definition of ‘natural’, the cornerstone of his reasoning on human sexual orientation.

By: Gyeong Hwa Pak

Gyeong Hwa Pak — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:00:00 +0000

If he’s a proponant of ID (which all peer reviewed scientific literature has shown to be complete bullshit), then it is no surprise that he would fail to do proper research on homosexuality as well.