Sign up for Email Updates

Posted August 31st, 2010 by Evan Hurst

As we found out earlier this year, the only thing George Rekers is really “good at” is hiring male escorts to “lift his luggage” on European vacations.  Apparently Focus on the Family is still too enthralled with the talking points his “work” provides them, so they’d like it if you didn’t make a big deal of the fact that they’re still using George Rekers as an expert.  Alvin McEwen has the goods, in a larger piece about FotF’s tacit support for bullying in schools:

[T]he most egregious error in Cushman’s piece, and it’s an error that says a lot not only about her mindset but that of Focus on the Family, is the following:

According to the medical and psychological experts writing in the Handbook of Child and Adolescent Sexual Problems, “The consequences of choices made with the advantage of developmental maturity are preferable to those consequences resulting from decisions made impulsively, in the absence of adequate knowledge, or without the moderating benefit of maturity. The latter choices will, of course, be imperfect, but the former regularly result in personal and social consequences that are painful, destructive, and not fully reversible.”

And just who are these experts? A quick look at the endnotes tells us the following:

Lundy, M.D., M.S., Michael S. and George A. Rekers, Ph.D., Fellow of the Academy of Clinical Psychology. “Homosexuality: Development, Risks, Parental Values, and Controversies,” Handbook of Child and Adolescent Sexual Problems, Ed. George A. Rekers, New York: Lexington Books, 1995, p.290.

You read that right. Our “beloved” solicitor of “luggage lifters,” George Rekers.

And that, dear readers, is how little shame Focus on the Family has.

Tags: , , , ,

4 Comments »

  1. NARTH still has 70 references to Rekers on their website.

    NARTH’s office manager told me that they “might” remove some if they were “outdated” — but that the scandal “did not invalidate the scientific validity” of Rekers’ work.

    Alan Chambers’ secretary at Exodus told me they would “probably” delete “all references” to Rekers, but Exodus still has four Rekers articles linked on its homepage. I guess they all stand by their man.

    Comment by Michael Bussee — August 31, 2010 @ 3:11 pm

  2. Personally, I’d prefer not to be their content manager. They have staff to decide what is “valid” for the ex-gay industry.

    If they choose to keep up the work of a “john” that visits male escorts, by all means, let them.

    Isn’t it best they show their true colors?

    Comment by Wayne Besen — August 31, 2010 @ 3:20 pm

  3. Considering they let Bryan Fischer spew his filth every day I’m not at all surprised. Rekers is tame comparison.

    Comment by Buffy — August 31, 2010 @ 4:13 pm

  4. When no real experts exist, strident anti-gay pressure groups are forced to use frauds as “experts.” This is why they will ultimately fail in their goal to eradicate gay people.

    Comment by Michael — August 31, 2010 @ 11:06 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment