I’m about sick of Bryan Fischer at this point. Come on, SPLC: I think it’s time for the American Family Association to win one of your special labels, if you know what I mean, and I think you do.
Bryan Fischer, today, on his radio show:
This is critical. This is one of the most important votes that is going to take place in the United States Senate in some ways probably in the history of our country because this would be huge victory for the homosexual agenda. This would be a major advance of the homosexual agenda. It would be hard to overestimate the victory that this would represent for the forces of sexual deviancy in the United States and the normalization of unnatural sexual behavior.
I don’t need to go into the details here with you but just remind yourself of the kind of sexual activity that we’re talking about. And remember that the folks that want this special treatment, their only distinguishing mark, the only thing that sets them apart from everybody else and then entire basis on which they are asking for special treatment, special privileges, special protections is the kind of unnatural sex they practice! That’s it! You can’t tell by looking at them; unless they tell you, you wouldn’t know. But they want special protections that are based exclusively on the kind of deviant sexual behavior in which they engage – putting parts of the human body to sexual use that were not designed for that purpose. And rather than be ashamed of that conduct, embarrassed by that conduct, they want to conduct to be celebrated, they want it to be celebrated openly, they want the United States military to endorse and sanction, legitimize, promote, recruit on the basis of that kind of sexual behavior. And this is something we have just absolutely got to stop. I mean this in many ways would be as fatal as any other achievement, accomplishment, victory for the homosexual agenda that you can imagine.
So you can hardly imagine the damage that this is going to do to our national security, to our national defense. We’re no longer going to have the privilege of being defended by people of character, by people of moral character, by people of moral integrity. Now the only people that are going to be allowed to wear the uniform of the United States military will either be sexual perverts, sexual deviants, or people who support sexual perversion or sexual deviancy. Can you imagine what that’s going to do to the strength and the ability of the United States military to be trained and to respond to threats against our national security.
I mean it just beggars the imagination and it’s just kind of a sad commentary about where we are at as a culture that this thing is even being considered as a possibility and being seriously entertained.
Bryan:
You are already being defended by people you consider to be “sexual perverts, sexual deviants, or people who support sexual perversion or sexual deviancy.” Tens of thousands of them. They are, to the last person, stronger than you, braver than you, smarter than you, and they will continue to be there, defending your right to be an unrepentant, uneducated and extremely vocal hick with no concept of the ideals of this great nation. You should be grateful, as the average man of your caliber doesn’t have the stones to wear the uniform.
If you can’t handle that, you’re welcome to move to a country more in line with your moral beliefs, like Saudi Arabia.










Like I said in my blog over at Religion Dispatches, there are already sexual perverts in the military – heterosexual ones. The military’s own statistics show that incidents of men committing sexual assault on women in the military was up 10 percent last year and women are more likely to be assaulted in the military than they are in civilian life.
If Bryan and his ilk are really concerned about sexual perverts in the military, there are plenty of straight ones that need weeding out.
However, that’s not their concern. Bryan could care less if a woman gets raped in the military – he’s only concerned if a man rapes another man, or just makes a pass at him. It’s all about protecting the MEN in the military – and their right to harass women as they please …
And who in the hell would make a pass at Bryan Fischer? My god.
Wingnuts don’t tend to be sexually appealing, really. It’s hard to maintain arousal when they’re shouting random nothings into your ear about the Amero.
I was in the military and I was gay at the time and so was my partner. My partner served 10 years in the Air Force with distinction and honor garnering awards and medals that even Bryan Fischer could only dream about. He served during the Persian Gulf War and had medals and certificates of merit to attest to that. But I guess that doesn’t matter to Bryan!
I served in the Navy for four years and not ONCE did i “oggle” or “lust” after my fellow shipmates(hell,none of them back wood boys was even REMOTELY attractive) I did my duty to the best of my ability and then some, all without winking at a fellow sailor or “putting my submarine in another mans port” I guess I must be the exception to the rule…LOL!
I think I see what he’s trying to say: that allowing people to get on with the vital job that they’re doing, viz protecting the safety of their country, without being harassed because of their sexual orientation or their private sex lives – in other words treating them exactly like everyone else – amounts to giving them “special treatment, special privileges, special protections”. I am lost in admiration of his faultless logic.
Silly Bryan. Does he really think all heteros subscribe to the “missionary position only, for spawning only” sex notion? There are plenty who engage in the buttseks, oral, and all sorts of other stuff that his ilk ascribe solely to Teh Gays. Some of them even do it gang-bang style.
And yes, there are homos who are currently defending his nasty, hateful a*s as we speak. Why I can’t fathom but they’re doing it.
Finally, I join you in begging SPLC to add the American “Family” Association to their special list. Hell, Bryan Fischer deserves his own special spot on it.
Oh, but we MUSTN’T do that…it may be seen as suppressing Bryan’s right of free speech! And THAT would be UN-AMERICAN!