Elitists of the world, unite! No, seriously, I’m really glad to see that other museums are pissed off that the Smithsonian caved to a bunch of prudish bigots in the removal of David Wojnarowicz’s work “Fire In My Belly.” Smith College will be displaying another work from the late artist in their Museum of Art in solidarity and protest. Here’s part of a statement from the Smith College Museum of Art:
Wojnarowicz produced A Fire in My Belly in 1987, shortly after his partner died of AIDS. His print, Untitled (One Day this Kid…) … was created three years later, when downtown New York City was still being decimated by the AIDS epidemic and conservative forces were fighting attempts to provide treatment and education on the grounds that homosexuals and homosexual activity were “immoral.”
The Smith College Museum of Art purchased Untitled (One Day this Kid…) with support from the Dorius/Spofford Fund for the Study of Civil Liberties and Freedom of Expression. The Fund honors former Smith faculty members Joel Dorius and Edward Spofford, dedicated teachers whose employment was terminated by the College in 1961, after it became known that they were homosexual.
Freedom of expression and tolerance are essential for the sustenance of open academic communities, and the rights of museums to present works of art from a variety of perspectives, free of the threat of censorship, must be preserved. The public has been denied access to one work by David Wojnarowicz. We hope that the exhibition of Untitled (One Day this Kid…) at the Smith College Museum of Art will serve as a reminder of our society’s obligation to confront the injustices of the past and to ensure that the discourse of the future is unfettered by inappropriate political pressure.
Here is the work they will be displaying. Wow.








What on earth is offensive about this work of art? If anyone can find anything that is actually offensive in any of what is depicted or written here they need therapy. The obsession those in authority seem to have with other peoples private sexual expressions is becoming endemic. When are the authorities that take actions like censoring works like this going to become adults and develop some backbone?
hm, it’s a nice piece of prose but one I find difficult to relate to. I don’t recall as a young teen wanting to put my naked body “on top of” ANYONE’S naked body. But i’m guessing that that is the part of the print certain people find offensive.
What a beautiful work of art. I can certainly relate to it. As a young teenager on a farm in Minnesota back in the fifties, I DESPERATELY wanted to place my naked body on that of the handsome 18-year-old neighbor boy. But I was much too terrified to do anything other than masturbate endlessly dreaming about it!
Jerry
[...] Smith College Displays Work of Censored Smithsonian Artist in Protest. Read more [...]
Hey editor,
I really believe that children should not be raised under such kind of poor counsel. Bad company corrupts good morals. Will that child ever reproduce if he gets married to a same sex? no! Reproduction is a law of nature if not God.Also enjoying good sex must with opposite sex. The Virgina is self lubricated for a penis to penetrate. Otherwise harm will be caused it artificial liquid is not applied into the annus.
Tony, your god is imaginary so there is no “law of god” and reproduction is not a law of nature as gayness exists throughout nature.
Tanukisan, I’m sure what they find offensive about it is that it was created by a gay artist.
Emily, I remember quite clearly even as young as 6 or 7 wanting skin on skin contact. It wasn’t that I wanted sex with anyone–it was just a sensual feling.
Priya, I’m kind of amazed you could make any sense of Tony’s post at all. It looks like he just put together a lot of random words.
Tony:
Well, good thing artificial lubrication exists. Just so you know, store lube is also used by women if their partners have a large penis, something I suspect you were not aware of. There are also women who do not produce a sufficient amount of fluid, thus they also buy the KY.
In your view, are these women disobeying the “law of God”?
Good point Wayne.
Tony, what do you think those smarmy KY jelly commercials are about–you know, the ones with the het couples talking about how good it is when they mix their lubes?
I’m glad to know about the self-lubricating powers of the “virgina.”