The New York Times had an interesting piece today by Adam Goodheart that touched on the origins of Christmas in America. You might be surprised to find that in 19th century America, the holiday had little religious significance compared to today:
Culturally, Christmas in 1860 was also at a strange transition point. In many parts of America, it was still celebrated as a riotous old pagan Saturnalia: working-class revelers known as “callithumpians” paraded through the streets in drag or blackface (sometimes both), firing off guns and starting street brawls, defying annual attempts by the city fathers to ban Christmas, as it were.
But commercialized, mass-market Yule was already coming into its own. An article in the New York Herald analyzed Christmas retail trends much as a newspaper today might do. (Candy sales were up compared to the previous December, while jewelry sales were down: consumers, anxious about the political news, were economizing on gifts.)
American Christmases in the mid-19th century do not seem to have had much religious significance – neither for the callithumpians, nor the proto-shopaholics, nor anyone else. Many, if not most, Protestant churches did not even have Christmas services, though some staged holiday parties, pageants, and “entertainments.” The New-York Tribune remarked in 1860 that only gradually was the festival starting to become as widely observed as more important national celebrations like the Fourth of July, Thanksgiving, and New Year’s Day.
These very interesting historical facts seem to run counter to the overbearing fundamentalists who scold most Americans for having fun on Christmas. It seems, like in every other aspect of life, the uptight fundies are factually wrong and have unnecessarily politicized this holiday.
So, have a great time this Christmas and don’t let self-righteous hypocrites use guilt to ruin your holiday. Eat, drink, and be merry — like Christmas was meant to be. Like it was in the good old days.









Have you ever wondered how Jesus got the last name Christ?
Christ was not a name at all, it comes from Greek for The Messiah. (in greek it is
“O Christos”) and thanks to revisionism by modern christians the actual translation of Jesus the Messiah became Jesus Christ. Dropping the “the” in their translation from Latin to English as there is no direct equivalent that makes it correct. This also allowed them to personalize Jesus so he was more “user friendly” in todays vernacular.
So the next time some wingnut claims the bible is ineffable (perfect) ask them about O Christos and watch their head explode when they realize Christ it is not really Jesus’ last name.
Greetings! and the abundance of love to you at this time of the year!
After all, Jesus in not “Religion” but the message of living in LOVE and sharing it with those around you. It is no wonder that “religion” has defaulted to a comercial or non commital stance. This does not change the very devinely human message of the LOVE of Jesus. Truely, MERRY CHRISTMAS dear ones!
Eternally,
Charles
mikenoia: And Jesus’ Dad’s name is Harold. You know, “Our Father, who art in Heaven, Harold be Thy name.”
Late to wish everyone the full “Happy Holidays”, though I hope Christmas/Yule was merry for all of you. Also a happy New Year.
This is so tired that the religious wrong brings this up every bloody year. Give it up! America is becoming increasingly secular and the sooner it accomplishes that, the better for all of us!