I’ve been repeating this for decades like it was a mantra, because it is: Homosexuals don’t love, they just have sex. This is how anti-gay bigots think. This is what I’ve seen from my one small spot on the front line of the culture war. It was what the gym teachers taught us in the sex ed class I sat in at 14 in junior high school. In one grotesque homosexual villain/pansy/psychopathic killer after another Hollywood brought it to life for me on the silver screen. And for just over a decade after getting my first Internet account I was lectured day after day on this fact by one half-witted bigot after another on alt.politics.homosexuality. It is preached from the pulpits. It is sung in the right wing echo chamber. It is a taken for granted everyday fact in the anti-gay industrial complex. Homosexuals don’t love, they just have sex.
The public faces of the anti-gay industrial complex will seldom say so outright, but just below the surface it is open and pervasive. Orson Scott Card, a member of the NOM board of directors, in his essay “Homosexual “Marriage” and Civilization” wrote:
“However emotionally bonded a pair of homosexual lovers may feel themselves to be, what they are doing is not marriage. Nor does society benefit in any way from treating it as if it were.”
Now look at that for a moment. “However emotionally bonded a pair of homosexual lovers may feel themselves to be…“ Here is the bedrock, the foundational doctrine of the absolute unhumanity of gay people that will not suffer examination or question. Card isn’t even willing to grant that that there is actually Any emotional bond at all between same sex couples, let alone bonds of romantic love but only, and grudgingly, that they might Think there are. At least pope Ratzinger was willing to grant homosexual love exists, even if “weak“.
In the late 90s while on alt.politics.homosexuality I found myself running into this brick wall constantly. Once a poster there wrote back at me slightly astonished that anyone might even mildly question the idea, that it was simply not possible that same sex couples could experience the depth of romantic feeling toward each other that male and female feel. The public faces of the anti-gay industrial complex will seldom say it out loud, usually choosing instead to argue that while gay couples may love each other their unions don’t deserve equal recognition in the law for…various reasons, none of which hold up to scrutiny (see Perry v. Schwarzenegger). But you hardly need scratch the surface to hear the common refrain, Homosexuals don’t love, they just have sex.
And never mind the facts…
How to Know You’re in Love? Brain Scans Tell All
Study Shows Certain Brain Regions Are Activated by Thoughts of Love
Romantic love lights up the same brain regions of lovers, whether they’re heterosexual or homosexual or male or female, a new study indicates.
Pictures from functional magnetic resonance imaging scans (fMRIs) show similar activity in cortical and sub-cortical brain regions when lovers, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, see images of their romantic partners, according to researchers at University College London.
…
Semir Zeki, a professor in the University College London’s Wellcome Trust Center for Neuroimaging, and John Romaya, a senior programmer, scanned the brains of 24 volunteers as they viewed pictures of their romantic partners.
The participants also looked at pictures of friends of the same sex as their lovers, but to whom they were not attracted.
While some brain regions showed increased activity when lovers viewed images of romantic partners, others shut down, such as parts of the temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex, which are thought to be important in judgment.
That finding lends credence to the adage that “love is blind,” says Zeki.
Half of the volunteers were males, half females, and six of each sex were homosexual and the other six heterosexual. And all told the researchers they were passionately in love with their partners.
The participants ranged in age from 19 to 47, and relationship lengths ranged from four months to 23 years.
All were asked to rate their feelings toward their romantic partners before and again after scanning, and to declare their sexual orientation in groups ranging from exclusively heterosexual to exclusively homosexual.
No. Love is not blind. It is that ever-fixed mark that looks on tempests and is never shaken. Prejudice is blind. Your gay and lesbian neighbors have been living their lives more and more openly now ever since Stonewall and all it takes to see that familiar bond of love and devotion between a same sex couple is to just look.
I appreciate that it’s easy for heterosexuals to mistake that complementary nature of lovers for gender. They mate to the opposite sex after all…it just all seems so utterly natural to them. But the complement in one another that makes two separate and distinct individuals into a couple isn’t gender, it’s the Person. Same sex couples experience this in exactly the way opposite sex couples do. It’s really not that hard to see.
But to see it you have to want to look. You have to be willing to see the people for the homosexuals. You have to be willing to let go of that comfortable conceit of heterosexual superiority when the plain and simple evidence that we are all more alike then different stares you in the face. You have to see your neighbor for the person they are, not the scarecrow your prejudices keep insisting they have to be.
Zeki says the study was influenced by a reading of world literature about love, including works by Shakespeare, Plato, and Dante. Their writings describe similar sentiments whether in the context of opposite sex or same sex relationships.
Yes. Of course. The MRI machine, looking dispassionately into the inner workings of our brains, showed what we humans had already known for ages. Prejudice divides us. Love makes us one.
For it was not into my ear you whispered, but into my heart. It was not my lips you kissed, but my soul. -Judy Garland







Fantastic post.
But to admit we actually love, they would have to admit they were harming actual human beings–not perverted sex fiends. Then it would all be over for them and their anti-gay agenda. Once they can no longer de-humanize the enemy they have lost the game.
Buffy there’s a lot of truth to that. I remember before same sex marriages became legal in Canada an anti-marriage activist was talking about a TV newspiece that showed a gay couple marrying in one of the provinces that allowed it. She complained that the coverage was unfair to her side because it showed two people who were obviously in love and that had no place in what she felt should be an abstract debate about whether gays and lesbians should be allowed to marry.
I think it was Ted Koppel on Nightline some years ago – when AIDS was killing so many gay men – who had a segment on his program about the devotion that a gay man showed his partner who was near death with AIDS. Ted was amazed that the man showed the kind of devotion to his partner that Ted felt for his wife. I was surprised at Ted’s amazement, having seen the devotion expressed by couple after couple as they dealt with each other’s illness.
But I guess if Ted was amazed so many years ago, we should not be surprised when other less open minded people are even today blind to the love we have for each other.
As devastating as AIDS was to our community, it did make many people aware that love is not bound by one’s sexual orientation. Love is universal. It pays no heed to such artificial categories. How sad the people who think their love is threatened by the love of others. How sad are those who feel the need to defend their love by attacking the love of others. How sad are those who think love is like a pie with only so many pieces, rather than like sunlight that gives life to all who feel its rays.
I think it’s too bad it too AIDS for straight people to “get” that we love each other.
But I have to say, it makes me feel useless as a lesbian, too. Like the only thing that defines the gay community’s love and perseverance against adversity and bigotry is a sexually transmitted disease that is rarer among women lesbian women than it is among straight and bi women.
A gay man on BTB once wrote in a comment, “lesbians didn’t NEED a disease to get their act together.” That’s a simplification of the matter but I can’t help but think of that statement whenever AIDS is brought up as the Definitive Epic Gay Community Battle.
Our friend, Jeremy Hooper has videos of his wedding for everyone to see. I’ve never met Jeremy, but I’ve been to two ss weddings. The first was between two men, who’d already been together for five years, they’ve been married for nine.
The other was two women, who have been together over 17 years.
I’ve been in love myself. I know it when I see it.
Blacks were painted with the same brush of being all sex, with no restraint, morality or maturity. Black sexuality has had similar libel as gays, especially black men.
Similar reduction to little more than apes and sex organs.
It makes me angry to hear such libel, and to have reality be so dismissed and ignored.
I’ve never met Jeremy. But I’m a forensic photographer, and I analyzed the pictures from his wedding and told him my findings.
I’m deeply immersed in the most perverse and reprobate things one human can do to another. We don’t have ENOUGH expressions of love in our society.
The protracted and repressive idea that coldness is masculinity and a show of affection is weak, is a shame.
Jeremy told me I was exactly right about how he was feeling that day.
His love for Andrew, touched my heart too, all the way from there to here.
As a somewhat attractive black gay male who lives in San Francisco I wish I was having the amount of sex these people think I do.
It’s an even bigger shame that a show of affection is considered “feminine” and THEREFOR “weak.”
All I can say is that I love my partner, Rick, with all my heart, soul and life. Couldn’t imagine life being this content, warm and happy without him. If the right wing wants to say that is fake, it is because they may be blind.
Thanks, Bruce…I enjoyed this article.
Oh look, it’s the H8r Recycling Program. Where’d this piece of revamped garbage come from?
Looks like someone took part of an apologia for slavery and buffed it up a bit to me:
Sure the slave might appear to cry when you sell their mates or offspring, but animals will show distress in such situations. It isn’t an expression of real emotion.
We have lives, not lifestyles.
We’re “friends”, not romantic partners.
We have sex, don’t make love.
It’s all about our dangly, or non-dangly, as the case may be, bits, not about anything else of importance.
It’s about physical satisfaction, not spiritual.
Heterosexuality is all aobut reproduction, and if you’re not here to reproduce, what the hell are you here for?
Because we are different, we’re a threat.
Because we’re different, we are the scapegoats for the heterosexuals’ failures as a class.
Because we’re different, we can’t take showers with normal people, because they NEVER check each other out, and we don’t know how to behave ourselves.
It’s all the same, all an attempt to justify the myth of heterosexual superiority, to sustain the security of strictly heterosexual hegemony, in service to the reality of heterosexual privilege.
… and it does it by attempting to dehumnaize and invalidate, to eliminate if possible, the one truly viable minority.
and it all boils down to 1) I hate queers 2) My religion hates queers 3) I hate myself because I might be queer 4) I;’m better than you becauase there are more of me than there are of you, and 5) Sex scares the crap out of me.
If any homesexual men are looking for free blow jobs in the Calgary area in Alberta, please feel free to phone me at 1-403-305-7727.
What we really must be alert to is the possibility of a violent overthrow by right wingers waving the cross in our faces while shooting some of us until the rest are intimidated back into the closet. I think we’re just that tad complacent . . that for our psychological comfort . . . we think “Oh that could not happen here” . . . . but there are signs that it could. This is one of the reasons we must be pro-active about advancing some . . any . . restrictions on guns and ammo, and very vigorously increase and then maintain the separation between church and state. That separation should be total but is not. Ever seen the letter Senator Jim DeMint sent to pastors, urging them to speak to their congregations about the importance of defeating hate crime legislation?
http://www.elijahmin.com/Senator's%20Letter.html
Here’s the letter:
Dear Champion of the Lord and the Preborn,
To those who think the Hate Crimes legislation is much to do about nothing, one Senator disagrees vehemently. Senator DeMint from the great state of South Carolina just released an open letter to the pastors of America. This is significant in many ways. First, when was the last time a politician saw fit to seek the aid of the church when it comes to the welfare of our nation? Secondly, he is affirming the inherent danger of S. 909 as it pertains to American liberty that finds its basis in faith in God and His moral laws. Thirdly, he is pleading with the pastors to lead their congregations in the moral outrage that will impact the Senate and defeat this tyranny once and for all. All this preacher can say is yes and amen and perhaps “DeMint for President!”
Please spread this challenge to pastors and congregations!
Subject: Hate Crime Legislation Must Be Stopped!
Dear Pastors and Religious Leaders:
The long debate over the “separation of church and state” has convinced many religious leaders that their opinions are not welcome in political debates. Many pastors hesitate to explain that government policies have helped cause the decline to America’s culture, morality, and spirituality. Many people of faith have given up their freedom of speech and the freedom to practice their religious principles in all areas of their lives.
I am writing you today to remind you that religious principles and biblical teachings produced the values and policies that made America exceptional, prosperous, and good.
In recent decades, Congress and the courts have adopted policies that have proved destructive to faith, families, and freedom in America, but no one action has been as damaging as the “hate crimes” legislation will be. This hate crime legislation will replace “equal justice under law” with arbitrary justice based on the race, religion, or sexual orientation of criminals and their victims. More importantly, it will lead to the criminalization of biblical truth as “hate speech.”
Under this legislation, a pastor who teaches that homosexuality is wrong could be accused of a hate crime or charged with “inducing” a violent crime against a gay person.
Please tell your congregation this legislation is not about “hate” (all violent crimes are hateful); it is about taking away your freedom to speak and preach biblical truth. It takes away your right to say that some things are wrong. We need millions of Americans to call and email their Senators, especially Democrat Senators who are pushing this legislation. Majority Leaders Harry Reid has promised to pass this legislation in the next few weeks (the House already has).
To learn more about the “hate crimes” legislation, refer to Family Research Council’s reference page on the topic, http://www.frc.org. And to find the email addresses and phone numbers of your Senators, link to http://www.senate.gov. or call the Capitol operator at 202-224-3121. Please act this week.
Sincerely,
Jim DeMint
[...] “For It was Not Into My Ear You Whispered, but Into My Heart…” Read more [...]
Wayne,
A well written piece and worth the read. I get so sick and tired of these right wingers associating homosexuality with just the term sex. I figured it out: The only reason they associate it that way is because that is all THEY think about…PERIOD!
I had a homophobe debate this issue with me online and his theory went like this: It has to be all about the sex with gay people,what else can it be about? You can’t tell me that when you are with a man that you don’t ogle him and undress him with your eyes or try to get close to this guy to see what he would feel like. Then he said this: “Hell, I’m a straight guy and that is what I would do with a woman…so you can’t tell me that gay men don’t do this, as well.”
Honestly, I don’t think it’s been about the sex with me at all. Sure, it’s kind of part and parcel to any relationship. However, I don’t make it my life ambition to be all about the sex,either.