Peter LaBarbera, in the middle of a wordy whine about the Illinois civil unions law:
These sad developments in the Land of Lincoln constitute further proof that homosexuality-based “rights” and religious freedom cannot co-exist. “Gay” activism – empowered by Illinois’ “sexual orientation” law and the new Civil Unions law — will drive out the free expression of religion and morality, which must include the right to oppose sexual behavior historically regarded as disordered and sinful.
They also define the word “oppose” incorrectly. You see, Peter is free to oppose gay people all he wants. If he opposes marriage equality, he is free to live by the confines of his religion and stay with his wife, refraining from marrying a leather daddy at one of the fetish conventions he photographs. He simply doesn’t have to do it! Nobody will make him. Just like I “oppose” religious fundamentalist nutjobbery. I’ll speak out and show people how in-your-face stupid religious fundamentalism is, how a perfunctory glance at reality is its simplest negation, etc. But I won’t try to take away their rights to be idiots.
But.
To the religious fundamentalist, their “religious freedom” trumps everybody else’s constitutional rights, because they [hilariously] think they are superior [even though they contribute little to nothing to society]. So when Porno Pete uses the word “oppose,” he means that he should be able to act to take away other peoples’ freedoms and rights, that he should be able to use his pretend moral authority, derived only from his 4th grade interpretation of an old book, to hurt other people.
Not gonna fly in America, Peter. Convert to Islam and move to Iran if that’s what you want. The only difference between your religion and the fundamentalist Islam practiced in that country is that your side occasionally drops an obligatory reference to Jesus and y’all aren’t allowed to hang people in this country [anymore].
Because, see, we on the side of reason don’t want to take anything away from people like Porno Pete. Oh sure, we know it hurts their fee fees any time they confront any piece of reality that, by its very existence, laughs at their beliefs. Fossils, for instance. They’re not protected against being made to look stupid, or like social pariahs, in the Constitution. But we don’t want to take away their fundamental rights. They do want to take ours away.
So we are at an impasse. We will continue to fight for our rights to be treated as equal citizens, in an American way that seeks to deny our opponents nothing, and they will continue to fight to hurt us in an extremely un-American way, deceived as they are into believing that this is “their” country and theirs only.
Oh, and they will continue losing, and we’ll just keep on winning.










Radical anti-gay activist LaBarbera’s jihad against law-abiding, taxpaying, gay Americans is also an attack on the religious liberty of all pro-equality people of faith. He is free to live as he wants and believe what he wants. He does not have the right however to redefine the Constitution for the rest of us.
Read the piece by Peter Montgomery at http://www.religiondispatches.org
[...] I thought I would share some interesting & darkly hilarious images found at the end of a video from the Chicago Anti-Gay Marriage Protest. My favorite has got to be the image concerning AIDS. It is amazingly selective & ignorant concerning sex and STD’s. Knowing that this is the strongest points of opposition toward Gay Marriage makes me a tad more secure in knowing that LGBT equality is not that far in the future for all of us (be sure to check out Evan Hurst’s post concerning Peter LaBarbera’s telling statement a…: [...]
We’ll keep winning, they’ll keep whining.
[...] At Least They Admit It: The Fundamentalist Definition of ‘Religious Freedom’. Read more [...]