I mentioned in a post yesterday that Bob Vander Plaats, Iowa’s Most Unhinged Wingnut, and his organization the FAMiLY LEADER [sic] had drafted a pledge for GOP candidates to sign, which affirms their anti-gay bigotry and hatred. Michele Bachmann was, of course, the first to sign it. But as usual, there’s more to the story, and anti-gay bigots never just traffic in one kind of hatred. Baratunde Thurston reports that indeed the very first bullet point in this pledge absolutely glorifies slavery. Here it is:
Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.
Oh wow. These people are as ignorant as they are hateful. I’ll let Baratunde’s words on the matter stand as the only commentary necessary:
Let me be clear. The opinions and analysis of this all-white, moralistic, American Taliban have no purchase in the land of black folk. It’s not like the Official Committee Of Black Folk (I’m a rotating co-chair for the Northeast Directorate) sits around wondering what THE FAMiLY LEADER thinks about our family situation, but still, to invoke slavery in “defense” of marriage exposes a complete lack of historical understanding and common sense, much less sensitivity.
Who in the world thinks bringing up slavery to defend family is a good idea?
To the extent that the black family was even allowed to exist, it was under constant attack by state-supported and sanctioned terrorism. “A child born into slavery was more likely to be raised by his mother and father…” Really? A child born into slavery was the property of its master. The operative word was slavery. Period. Any relationship to its biological parents was far less respected than its commercial relationship to the American economy.
You hear these arguments all the time from common racists who don’t think they’re racists. It’s much more common to hear it in the South, from people who have been raised to believe that The Civil War wasn’t about slavery, and who will then assert that “it was terrible, but a lot of slaves had it really good!” To which I always reply, “Yes, it was about slavery, and uh…they were slaves.”
Anyway, so there you go: Michele Bachmann signed a pledge that absolutely glorifies the enslavement of black Americans. Oh, and it’s also anti-porn. Read all of Baratunde’s piece and then go read Amanda.










Did she even READ what she signed? FFS. Slave marriages weren’t legally recognized so that masters could split up families to be sold. That was a regular thing. ASDFGJKL. I don’t even…
Michele Bachmann is hysterical! I love this woman! Who needs the Tonight Show when you have her!?
michele bachmann is obviously a fool. unfortunately with our fearless leaders reducing the money sent to schools for student’s education, more people will listen to this garbage and actually believe it. she home-schools her adopted children which means there will be more unintelligent little bachmanns running around. and they will have their own little bachmanns. a mess of homophobic illiterate ignoramuses with big phoney smiles. we need help.
The liberal spin on this is something else! Slaver owners were democrats. Now they just keep them in ghettos, gangs and prisons. She’s not saying slavery was good, just that the fathers were THERE! Slavery couldn’t break up the strong loving black family, but we teach our black children to make babies and hit the road. Black babies get aborted at a higher percent than any other race. Get off the democrat plantation folks! The truth shall set you free! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5YfMzQtb1Y
It looks like somebody missed the great political switch following the passage of the Civil Rights Act. And it was rather difficult for a father to be there for his children when his master sold him but not the rest of his family.
So Jaime, besides the sheer idiocy of your comment, why are you defending bachmann? You do realize that the people she represents have a mind-set about race which isn’t much different than it was in the antebellum south. In bachmann’s circle, the only thing ‘they’ are good for is cooking, serving drinks and then cleaning up after the good, white, ‘Christian’ republicans have gone home.
Jaime, you’ve GOT to be kidding!? I think you’ve been watching too much Maury Show!
Jaime, you understand how slavery works right? You’re right slavery could break up the family because they couldn’t leave even if they wanted because they were slaves…..
Oh Jaime, you shouldn’t watch one (really stupid) youtube video and think you’re educated on a subject. You really need to do a little more research.