(Weekly Column)
Sometimes I’m amazed by the rapid success of the gay rights movement. Homosexuality, the love that dare not speak its name, is now spoken freely, while homophobia has quickly become the hate that dare not speak its name – at least if one is running for higher office.
On ABC’s This Week, presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann was asked about a statement she made in 2006 calling homosexuality “personal bondage, personal despair, and personal enslavement.” Bachmann declined to say whether she still believed her previous tirade: “I am not running to be any person’s judge. And I give — I ascribe dignity and honor to all people, no matter who they are. And that’s how I view people.” She continued equivocating on NBC’s Meet the Press: “I don’t judge them. I don’t judge them,” she told host David Gregory. “I’m running for the presidency of the United States.”
For her entire political career Michele Bachmann practically walked around in a black robe and slammed LGBT people over the head with a gavel. Now this modern day Anita Bryant suddenly isn’t judgmental? Bachmann’s incredible copout is about as believable as Joan Rivers running for president and suddenly claiming that she never told jokes.
Her husband Marcus was just as disingenuous during a heated exchange with Iowa State University professor Warren Blumenfeld: “I do not use reparative therapy, none of our clinic therapists do. What we do is we counsel; we talk to [patients] about whatever they want to talk about….There is not anything that comes close to reparative therapy.”
It is not surprising to hear the Bachmann’s dissemble. After all, lying comes as easily to them as breathing. What is shocking is that they now view outright anti-gay bigotry as detrimental to winning national office. Even in a virulently anti-everything GOP presidential primary, candidates like Bachmann are toning down the overt gay bashing.
The Bachmann family is not alone. Christine O’Donnell, occasional witch and former Delaware Republican Senate candidate, appeared on CNN’s Piers Morgan Show and refused to answer questions on her past anti-gay extremism, which included running her very own “ex-gay” ministry called Savior’s Alliance for Lifting the Truth (SALT).
When asked about marriage equality, she obfuscated and then robotically repeated that she was there to “talk about the issues I chose to talk about” in her new book. When pressed by Morgan, she accused the host of being rude. It wasn’t too long ago that O’Donnell would have accused Morgan of being discourteous if he had not asked her about her signature issue. As the polls change, however, so do the interests of ambitious politicians who want to be seen as mainstream.
At the very moment conservative politicians are running away from the gay, Religious Right activists are becoming more extreme. For example, Linda Harvey exemplified the radicalism this week on her radio show: “We could also close down homosexual bars and bathhouses, that would be a start. God never created people to engage in these unnatural acts.”
Tony Perkins, leader of the Family Research Council, a certified Southern Poverty Law Center Hate group, attacked President Barack Obama last week for his participation in Dan Savage’s “It Gets Better Project,” which is designed to keep bullied LGBT youth from committing suicide.
“It’s disgusting,” Perkins wrote in a fundraising letter, “And it’s part of a concerted effort to persuade kids that homosexuality is okay and actually to recruit them into that ‘lifestyle.’”
The big question: how long will these fringe activists continue to nod and wink, before they think slick politicians like Bachmann and O’Donnell stink?
We already saw the first evidence of backlash from The Media Research Center’s L. Brent Bozell who called O’Donnell a “buffoon” that “made an ass of herself.”
It is easy to see why candidates are beginning to inch away from the more insane positions of anti-gay activists. In a recent New York Times op-ed, two political scientists wrote that the Tea Party “is even less popular than much maligned groups like ‘atheists’ and ‘Muslims.’ Interestingly, one group that approaches it in unpopularity is the Christian Right.”
And what is the Christian Right if not a group defined by its opposition to abortion and disdain for LGBT people?
The delicate dance between GOP candidates and fringe activists will continue to play out. Pollsters are imparting to candidates that remaining stealth on gay issues is better for their long-term political health, while socially conservative organizations are making the case that gay bashing is better for their political wealth in terms of money and enthusiastic voters.
Attacking LGBT people is not yet a third rail of politics. It is also clear that it is no longer the Holy Grail for electing Republicans that it once was in the not too distant past.










What I cannot stand is the hypocrisy behind it all. By denying their anti-gay history they are denying their own religiously held belief system. That shows that they can deny anything while in office without blinking. Now, if they had said, “I have become an atheist and I now don’t believe that gay civil rights should be squashed.” then I might have to take a second look. However, that is not the case. These people are just outright lying to the public.
“I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.”
- Susan B. Anthony -
You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do.
If she and Marcus housed 23 kids, I would like to know what their thoughts are on the couple.
Well, if you can’t make your God agree with you on the “abomination” of homosexuality, what good is he to you. People who claim God as their own, always make sure he agrees with them, no matter how radical their words or actions. Of course, they always phrase it as them agreeing with Him, but that’s just necessary so they can put the halos over their heads.
Bachmann is running for President. Yeah, and if, somehow, she got elected, she would be dealing with gay issues. She would get to appoint judges who would be judging gays on various issues. She would have to deal with the issue of gays wanting full equality, all the federal benefits heterosexuals have. She would have to deal with federal departments that have non-discrimination policies. So, yes, her views on gays, as people, do matter.
I know some real Christians. Members of my family are Christian – open minded, loving, supportive, following the golden rule. But they don’t make a big deal out of being Christian. But when I hear these lying people such and Michele and Marcus and Christine and Peter and Tony and little Timmy Dolan making a big deal of being Christian while they lie about those of us who are LGBT and deny that they are lying, I want to barf.
Back in 2000 I wrote to the FRC asking why they were so opposed to the recognition of gay relationships. And I asked them also “Who does Scripture say is the “father of lies?” They responded with their typical nonsense about why they opposed same sex relationships. And they said “the ‘father of all lies’ in the Bible is Satan.” They somehow didn’t get the connection between the lies they tell and the father of those statements being Satan.
Whether there is a god or a Satan is irrelevant. The reality is that these people are liars and cowards when confronted with their statements and the consequences of those statements. What they do is evil, pure and simple.