In an effort to make sure that all Orthodox Jews fulfill the Biblical commandment to have children, gay Jewish organization Kamoha and Rabbi Arele Harel of Israel’s West Bank now run a matchmaking service to help gay and lesbian Jews marry–each other. The rabbi tells the folks he’s been setting up that they will learn to love each other once the children arrive. And how are the happy couples doing? None would talk to the media, apparently. But one guy trying the service told the AP he might talk to his future wife about continuing to date men. According to the rabbi, this is okay:
Harel said as long as both parties are aware the other is dating, it would not be adultery in such a union. He said the same would not be true for a straight couple because they are sexually compatible* and have no reason to look elsewhere. Jewish law forbids adultery.
Interestingly, the rabbi’s plan is being criticized by other rabbis because he isn’t encouraging gays and lesbians to change their sexual orientations. Kamoha’s website almost but doesn’t quite take a stand on that strategy:
In order to prevent a situation in which after several years of marriage, one of a couple’s spouses goes through a change in sexual orientation…(those) suitable for this project are those who are not in the process of trying out a new sexual orientation, but rather for those who have accepted themselves as being gay or lesbian….We assist couples, whose desire it is to establish a family, and who have already accepted the fact that they will never be able to alter their orientations. (emphasis in original text)
Not only is a same-sex wedding impossible in Israel, but so are civil weddings. The theocratic Israeli law in this regard requires that all weddings involving Jews be signed off on by Orthodox leaders, so many Israelis go to Cyprus or elsewhere to tie the knot. There are few options for gay couples wanting to raise children, though some, presumably non-Orthodox, choose surrogacy or adoption of a partner’s child.
The kludgy Kamoha-Harel response to the inconvenient truth of Orthodox homosexuality reminds me of the eruv, a ceremonial fence usually consisting of a wire strung between telephone poles that allows observant Orthodox Jews to carry things on their person on Shabbat. By making a public space ritually private, the eruv attempts to reconcile the religious illegality of carrying things in public on Shabbat with the fact that people need to be able to push baby carriages and carry house keys if they want to step outside their homes on Friday nights and Saturdays. There are some social upsides to the eruv–for one thing, it can render a neighborhood cozy when one’s social group has moved to homes inside the boundary–but it can also lead to ridiculous situations, as when people won’t step past it to finish walking home a friend who doesn’t live within it, since completing the stroll would require them to leave their carried belongings. To people with this cast of mind, ditching someone at the boundary is the lesser of two evils, just as to Harel it’s apparently better to commit to a passionless marriage as long as you do as the Torah commands and create children. I wonder how he reconciles this with onah, the Jewish law that requires a husband to sexually satisfy his wife?
* Which would mean this rabbi assumes any straight man and any straight woman are sexually compatible solely by dint of their straightness–a view of human sexuality that’s inaccurate at best. According to the AP, Harel also believes some gays and lesbians can change their sexual orientations.









The energy people spend trying to satisfy the demands of the gods and the sacred writings of bronze age shepherds just amazes me.
good plan!
If you think we have problems just wait until you see our solutions!
Wow. This is the kind of “solution” that sounded like a good idea to me when I was in elementary school and had only the faintest glimmer of an understanding of the concept of sexual orientation. (You know, lesbians = masculine women, gays = feminine men, which are basically the same thing from two different directions, right? Voila, everyone’s happy!) But then I turned nine, you know? Kids have an excuse for being naive and stupid about things — they’re kids, and on a lot of topics they only know what they’ve been told. I don’t understand how you could be an educated, fully-grown adult and still think like this.
The prophet Yishaiyahu (Isaiah) said of eunuchs (i’m paraphrasing): “do not say ‘Lo, I am a dry tree.’ follow the Lord’s commandments and keep His sabbaths and you will be granted a gift greater than sons or daughters; an everlasting memorial to your name.”
That is, having kids is not necessary. There was a sage who said “there are plenty of others who will bear children” (referring to his own confirmed bachelor lifestyle).
the black-hatted patriarchy is not near and dear to my heart. sometimes i think they just worship the restrictive mitzvot as if they were the greatest part of the Torah…
Emily K: It’s idolatry.
Emily, using obscure jewish words doesn’t make you cool.
@ Paul Douglas
Thhhhaaankkkkk youuuuu
A certain Christian minister, Michael Piazza, Dean of the Cathedral of Hope, on YouTube offered a word for word translation of Lev. 18:22, which is one of the scriptures fundamentalist types wield as a weapon against homosexuals. That translation is: “Two men must not engage in sexual activity on a woman’s bed; it is ritually unclean.” If his translation is correct, it robs the gay-bashers in religion of a major arrow in their quiver.
So if this Christian minister Michael Piazza is correct in his translation of Lev. 18:22, then we’ve been hornswoggled by fundamentalist types twisting their translations of the scriptures to fit their gay-bashing bias. Oy vey.
One more thing. I note that in the Old Testament, as it worked out in practice, two men were never punished for having sex with each other. The instances where homosexual behavior was punished were solely instances of men raping or trying to rape.
One last thing. I haven’t worked out my final judgment on same-sex sexual relations. But what I’m trying to do until then is get rid of the biased interpretations and assumptions, clear the air of all the smoke and fury generated by fundamentalists, so I can see what I’m thinking.