Comments on: Iowa Bigots Sad

By: Gianni

Gianni — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:34:51 +0000

Well, perhaps this is indicative of weak minds nominating unacceptable candidates. I’d like to believe that the general public just might wonder that if a candidate has such bigoted ideas toward gay citizens, what other animosities are guiding his attitudes/thinking? Perhaps, also, people are beginning to realize that constitutions are not meant to spell out the minutiae of society, but are there to enumerate the powers/limitations of government and the people and to guarantee the rights and protections of the citizens, aka: equality. One can only hope this is a trend.

By: Paul Douglas

Paul Douglas — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:20:30 +0000

John, I doubt that the GOP will be too upset with NOM; they’re two peas in a pod if not the same pea.

By: Peter Hargmier

Peter Hargmier — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:21:23 +0000

Ha! NOM just spent $40,000 on f**k all! A-hahaha!

By: John

John — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:46:52 +0000

The Iowa GOP must be really thrilled with NOM’s characterization of their nominee as a weak candidate. A slap in the face of your supporters is a good way to keep supporters. Not.

By: Priya Lynn

Priya Lynn — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:38:49 +0000

I realize that, that’s why I suggested the [so-called] in brackets which indicates it was not a part of the original quote.

By: Evan Hurst

Evan Hurst — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:35:55 +0000

Well, that was part of a quote, so no need to modify.

By: Priya Lynn

Priya Lynn — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:14:04 +0000

Please don’t blindly accept the anti-gays dishonest characterization of their organizations as “pro-family”. When they refer to themselves as “pro-family” always put it in quotes or add [so-called] in front of it.