Linda Harvey of the small hate outfit Mission America pretty much thinks about one thing and one thing only, namely her visceral and unreasonable hatred toward gay people. Indeed, it seems, as with her friend Porno Pete, to be her job. So right before Christmas, she took to the intellectual wasteland known as WorldNetDaily with her top ten list of the things that gays did this year that upset her. Let’s take a gander at it:
So, No. 10 on my list is the growing number of incidents where homosexuals are trying to put Christians out of business, get them fired, get them expelled from college programs and so on. Example: A bed and breakfast owner in Illinois is being sued for refusing to rent out his facility for a homosexual civil union ceremony and reception.
No, homosexuals are not putting “Christians” out of business or get them fired, but there are a handful of situations where fundamentalist Christians are trying to use their belief systems as an excuse to not perform the expected duties of their jobs. In the case of “getting them expelled from college programs,” it’s the same thing. Fundamentalists want special rights, special passes, that allow them to do substandard work and get away with it because they believe it’s what God would want. Sorry.
No. 9 is the assault of the sex change agenda on our children. Two lesbian women in California are raising their adopted 11-year-old son as a girl, a process they started when he was just eight. These twisted adults with their own apparent issues have lined up tragically misguided doctors to give this boy hormone -blocking drug therapy. We should all pray for this young boy and his adoptive parents.
I’m not too familiar with that story, but I do know that professional mental health associations are recommending several approaches when it comes to kids who identify as transgender, one of which is a therapy which staves off puberty for a while, so that the kid can make the most informed decision when the time is right. [By the way, most transgender people know they're transgender at a very young age, just as most gay people know at a very young age.]
My No. 8 incident of homosexual abuse is Macy’s Department Store and its cooperation with sex-change anarchy. The clothing store fired an employee in San Antonio, Texas, who refused to let a man use the women’s fitting room. She claimed her religious rights under employment law; Macy’s claimed transvestite rights superseded faith. What happened to the Constitution? And what’s happening to America? I hope America avoids Macy’s after this anti-Christian, anti-family, anti-woman decision.
The old “men using women’s fitting rooms/bathrooms” ooga booga canard. It relies on people’s fundamental/ist ignorance of what transgender actually means and what it doesn’t. This allows immature people like Linda to get away with childish taunts about “transvestite rights,” without her readers realizing just how much she’s phoning it in right now.
No. 7 includes a new arrow in the “gay” activist quiver: unapologetic violence. Vandals were caught on the security camera in an Oct. 15 attack against the pro-family group, Americans for Truth about Homosexuality, or AFTAH. Chunks of concrete with a threatening note were hurled through the window of the Christian Liberty Academy in suburban Chicago the morning before an AFTAH conference was held at the school. A homosexual radical claimed responsibility on the Internet, yet no arrest has been made. This frightening incident would have been headlines if the victims had been homosexual, but the media mostly ignored it.
That, dear readers, was most likely a hoax. Since that is Linda’s only example, I’ll simply point out that the remainder is zero, while the teachings, words and deeds of people like Linda Harvey are a big part of the gay teen suicide problem. I’d call that violence.
And abuse No. 6 is the slander and libel against New Jersey teacher Viki Knox. Last fall, special education teacher Viki was very troubled by a pro-homosexual bulletin board display at the high school where she taught. She shared her dismay based around her Christian principles with a few close friends on Facebook. Before she knew it, her comments were headlines in the New York Times, she was suspended from her job, and state and national homosexual pressure groups were leading anti-”hate” demonstrations at the school calling for her dismissal.
Pretty typical story. Woman says ignorant things on internet. Woman is in position of authority over children. Reasonable people see that her beliefs about an entire minority are bigoted, hateful and dangerous to children. Etc. Whatever. Linda links back to her own story about the incident, though, and it’s one of the best examples of “waaaaaah, we are the real victims!” I’ve ever seen, so y’all should read it.
So that’s half of her list. So far we’ve just got a bunch of whining from somebody who wants special rights not granted by the Constitution based on her chosen, unnatural bigotry. I wonder what the rest of the list is like!
Now, here’s No. 5: the passage of S.B. 48 in the state of California. This fact-free legislation that no one ever thought we would see in America, calls for sweeping pro-homosexual indoctrination in the public schools beginning Jan. 1, 2012.. Children will be compelled to learn about homosexuality, and those lessons must affirm this negative, high-risk lifestyle. California parents are outraged at such a discriminatory mandate, but short of repeal, their option is to remove their children from the schools or exit the state.
That law is actually about the contributions of LGBT Americans throughout history, but Linda never lets facts get in the way. How many gay teens committed suicide last year, Linda?
No. 4 on my list is the global homosexual agenda of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Just a few weeks ago, the White House and Secretary Clinton announced that United States foreign aid and support will be related to how well a country pushes homosexual behavior as a so-called “human right.” This agenda is not backed up by U.S. law, and is another example of warped priorities and inappropriate use of authority by this administration.
Oh, I KNOW, Linda, it’s terrible seeing the United States catch up with the grown-up nations of the world, instead of hanging back in the anti-gay gutter with Uganda and Iran. Why can’t we be more like they are?!
No. 3 is the deceptive “It Gets Better” video campaign organized by Dan Savage, a homosexual writer known for his sleaze and vulgarity, extreme even for a “gay” activist. This campaign exploits vulnerable children, as celebrities, regular folks and teens themselves post videos with the goal of discouraging suicide. That would be a worthy objective, if not combined with “gay” rights mythology. Kids are encouraged to stay the course, adopt a homosexual identity and thereby expose themselves to lifelong risk. Even the president has jumped into this effort, mischaracterizing this propaganda as an “anti-bullying” effort.
Considering Linda is one of the most vicious writers in the country when it comes to feeding anti-gay hate into the public discourse, hate which, unfortunately trickles down to kids [the only "trickle-down" system that actually works, I've said], I don’t think I need to spend much time defending Dan’s work here. Linda’s version of an anti-bullying policy would include special rights for fundamentalist Christians to abuse gay people, as long as they’re doing it in service of their deeply held religious beliefs. Of course, the truth of the matter is that without those deeply held anti-gay religious beliefs, regular schoolyard bullying of gay kids wouldn’t have much of a foundation, now would it? Linda’s brand of fundamentalist hatred is the root system of the gay teen suicide tree, lovely readers, not a random branch.
No. 2 is the attack on the federal Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA. Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have announced they won’t defend this federal law against lawsuits initiated by homosexual activists. Who knew that presidents get to choose which federal laws to protect and defend? Obama even told the “gay” pressure group, Human Rights Campaign, that he favors repealing DOMA.
Indeed, I have never heard of a President changing a law, or opposing a law, especially one like this one, which is widely viewed [by smart people, not bigots] to be unconstitutional. Again, Linda’s phoning it in for readers whose brains have been asleep for a long, long time.
And the No. 1 abuse of homosexual activism in the United States in 2011, was the implementation of the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” allowing open homosexual behavior in our military. No one can yet know how damaging the repeal of the ban on sodomy will be – we can only guess – but there’s no question that it will damage the character of our armed forces and undermine their effectiveness.
Dare I say the obvious? We need non-effeminate men in the military. Does anyone really believe that a prancing drill sergeant won’t detract from readiness? Where women are serving, they should be women of high character, not those who embrace homosexual conduct and publicly declare a “sin” identity. These folks have truly lost their way, their shame, their innate sense of God’s touch on and design for their lives.
Hahaha, I love it that she pulls out the “we need non-effeminate men” thing. Aside from the fact that gay soldiers have fought and died valiantly over the years to protect Linda’s right to shame-scowl at the American public from behind her computer, it’s interesting to me that she actually believes that gay soldiers are inherently effeminate. This goes against her buddies Bryan Fischer and Tony Perkins, whose fear of super-hero homosexual soldiers with magical masculine powers strong enough to upend the entire military is well-documented and quite funny. Of course, it does reveal just exactly how unqualified Linda Harvey is to make any pronouncements on gay people whatsoever, considering the fact that her idea of us is apparently one stereotype that I assume got passed down to her by another, older bigot at some point.
Of course, her statement that “no one can yet know how damaging the repeal” will be is stupid, as it is an already answered question. The strong, brave, smart men and women of the United States Military have a lot thicker skin and stronger constitutions than Linda and her milquetoast ilk, and they have greeted repeal with a collective shrug. Even the Marines, Linda! They simply are no longer in need of your concern trolling.
Anywho, that’s Linda’s list. I hope the rest of you out there will see this as an example of why it looks pathetic to make lists of “the top ten things I want to complain about this year,” especially if they’re all complaints about a minority group. It’s just not adult behavior, and I know folks throughout Christendom who could explain that screeds like hers are the antithesis of Christianity.










This whacko is obsessed with homosexuality. We all know what that means folks. I’m quite sure she spends alot of time watching lesbian porn on personal computer!
Most if not all of Harvey’s complaints are projections of her own desires.
She has openly displayed overbearing paternal gender-role confusion, led calls to silence sexual minorities, affirmed others’ bullying and violence against religious and sexual minorities, expressed an obsessive fear of sexuality, and voiced terror at suggestions that the one true God might not smite everyone who disagrees with her.
Oh rubbish, Linda. Now be gone before someone drops a house on you.
I’ve never met the woman, but I am fairly certain that she would be the type of person that, if I ever waited on her in a restaurant where the entrees were over ten dollars, or if I booked her for a hotel that didn’t have an attached Cracker Barrel, I would walk away annoyed at the quality of people who stumble in these places sometimes, and she would just bark loser words to herself as the motor home drove away, in search of a Wal-Mart parking lot with outlets.
So by “abuses of homosexual activism”, what she means is, “any instance in which LBGT people are taken seriously and treated as human beings equal to herself”. Am I correct?
She’s a shrill bitter woman struggling to migrate from the B-list of Christian bigots to the A-list where she could hobnob with the crowd that includes Maggie Gallagher. When WorldNetDaily is virtually the only place you get published, you know you’re on the B-list.
I think the description that these Dominionists want ‘special rights’ to selectively discriminate is one of the best, most apt, and most CONCISE descriptions ever. Hell, I used to struggle to describe the convoluted pretzel-logic the Dominionists use in their bigotry and hatred, but now it’s easy – I just say ‘You want a special right to discriminate.’ Ahhh, simplicity coupled with effectiveness.
Hatemongers like Linda will lie, distort the facts, and use scaremonger tactics galore to demonize LGBT Americans to their listeners. Hmmm… bearing false testimony against your neighbors. What does your Bible say about that Linda?
Are there any lesbian readers out there willing to eat this woman’s box? She needs it in the worst way.
@ Gianni – LOL !!!!!
My partner was in the Army for 30 years and made full Colonel–he is anything but effeminate (though he loves to cook ;))
As for transgendered children getting hormones to block puberty-Anderson Cooper has this on his morning show last week and the kids were very happy *now* and looking forward to full transition when they got older. The one girl (born male) tried to kill herself by running out into traffic until her parents realized what was going on, and were well informed and compassionate enough, to get her the medical guidance that she and they needed. I guess Linda would rather have these kids be miserable and die than be and live who they really are.
Excuse my vulgarity, but after reading the above list, all I can say is, this b***h is a total C-nt!
*had* this on his morning show…..
“These folks have truly lost their way, their shame, their innate sense of God’s touch”. I’m not sure I want Linda’s god touching me.
-
@Gianni. The very thought makes me retch.
The main justification for lumping gay people in with transgendered people, as in “LGBT” is that the anti-gay side considers us one and the same, so therefore we for some reason should define ourselves accordingly.
Linda Harvey assumes that gay male soldiers would necessarily be prancing effeminates. Evan Hurst rebuts this, but every time TWO uses “LGBT” it is promoting the very stereotypes that Linda Harvey believes. Either gay men are fully men or they are, at some definitional level, linked with transgenderism. I say that the former is true and the latter is a lie and we should stop promoting that lie via LGBT.
Reasonable people see that her beliefs about an entire minority are bigoted
The only thing bigoted here are the hate-filled homophobes that quiver in their shoes each time a homosexual decides to leave behind such a destructive lifestyle, usually to heal emotional pain.
By the metrics of suicide and physical disease, its a no-brainer.
Bigots.
13-J D Curtis.
You say;
The only thing bigoted here are the hate-filled homophobes that quiver in their shoes each time a homosexual decides to leave behind such a destructive lifestyle, usually to heal emotional pain.
Some serious, respectful questions;
Are you saying that ‘hate-filled homophobes’ are upset at the idea of a homosexual leaving their lifestyle?
Surely someone who is against homosexuality would be glad at the idea of a LGBT person leaving behind the lifestyle.
(I might have read it wrong, but I have read it several times and that is what you seem to be saying).
According to your understanding, what is the ‘destructive lifestyle’ that homosexuals live? Would you say someone who doesn’t smoke, drink alcohol, do drugs or gamble, goes to work and comes home, goes into their nearest city every so often to buy a book and have a coffee and a look round the shops and comes home, who cares for their cats and gives to charity, who visit their elderly Mum every week is living a destructive lifestyle?
Are you saying that suicide and physical disease is more prevalent amongst people who identify as LGBT?
Why do you think that is?
Anyhow, I look forward to your answers.
All the best.
Wow JD Curtis. That was really stupid.
Are you saying that ‘hate-filled homophobes’ are upset at the idea of a homosexual leaving their lifestyle?
Yes Jessica, I am and I would cite this link to back up my assertion although there are others I could use as well. Perhaps more specifically, the Gay Left cannot stand the idea of a former homosexual speaking publically about their conversion.
Now a question for you. Do you support the free-speech rights of ex-gays to have their voices heard in such forums or must they be silenced?
According to your understanding, what is the ‘destructive lifestyle’ that homosexuals live? Would you say someone who doesn’t smoke, drink alcohol, do drugs or gamble, goes to work and comes home, goes into their nearest city every so often to buy a book and have a coffee and a look round the shops and comes home, who cares for their cats and gives to charity, who visit their elderly Mum every week is living a destructive lifestyle?
No Jessica, I would say that gay sex is extremely high risk and that this is completely independent of if they visit their Mum or not or otherwise are good citizens.
Furthermore, are you quite prepared to call out the hate-filled, religious zealots at the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association who spell out in painful detail that this is so? Are they all liars?
Well, J D Curtis;
I asked; Are you saying that ‘hate-filled homophobes’ are upset at the idea of a homosexual leaving their lifestyle?
Your response; Yes Jessica, I am and I would cite this link to back up my assertion although there are others I could use as well. Perhaps more specifically, the Gay Left cannot stand the idea of a former homosexual speaking publically about their conversion.
That link is about PFOX not being allowed equal time with other groups at a national convention by a national PTA in Tennessee. But the surely ‘Gay Left’ are not ‘Hate filled homophobes’? Or are they? Excuse me for being so bold, but I think you may mean ‘hate filled heterophobes’?
You say; Now a question for you. Do you support the free-speech rights of ex-gays to have their voices heard in such forums or must they be silenced?
I’m British, I live in England, where we don’t have freedom of speech written into our laws and I don’t think such an organisation made up of ex-gays exists in any great number. But yes. I do think ex-gays should be allowed to speak. Why not? Fair goes for all. Same as I think same sex marriage should be allowed. Two consenting adults who just happen to be the same gender should be allowed to make a commitment to one another.
My next question; According to your understanding, what is the ‘destructive lifestyle’ that homosexuals live? Would you say someone who doesn’t smoke, drink alcohol, do drugs or gamble, goes to work and comes home, goes into their nearest city every so often to buy a book and have a coffee and a look round the shops and comes home, who cares for their cats and gives to charity, who visit their elderly Mum every week is living a destructive lifestyle?
Your answer; No Jessica, I would say that gay sex is extremely high risk and that this is completely independent of if they visit their Mum or not or otherwise are good citizens.
You don’t seem to have answered this question.
I think you mean thoughtless, unprotected sex with lots of drink and drugs=the gay lifestyle.
I’ll tell you something, shall I? That link leads to a ‘worse case scenario’, having wild unprotected sex with anything that moves no matter the gender. Of course that is a dangerous, silly activity. Straight people do it, too.
I can’t answer for gay men, but most of it seems to be how dangerous gay male sex is. But every lesbian I know, I have met, past and present do not fit into this category;
Not only did lesbians commonly have sex with men, but with lots of men. They were 4.5 times as likely as exclusively heterosexual controls to have had more than 50 lifetime male sex partners.64 Consequently, the lesbians’ median number of male partners was twice that of exclusively heterosexual women.65 Lesbians were three to four times more likely than heterosexual women to have sex with men who were high-risk for HIV disease-homosexual, bisexual, or IV drug-abusing men.66 The study “demonstrates that WSW [women who have sex with women] are more likely than non- WSW to engage in recognized HIV risk behaviours such as IDU [intravenous drug use], sex work, sex with a bisexual man, and sex with a man who injects drugs, confirming previous reports.”67
I have, however, know straight women, usually victims of childhood sex abuse by a male relative or neighbour, who indulge in such behaviour because they are taught that’s all they are worth.
I don’t know, but it seems as if the people who did the survey picked a certain group of high risk lesbians (lesbians do not have sex regularly with men. That’s why they are lesbians. Bisexual women more so).
Straight or gay or anything in between, if they find a way to escape from this self destructive lifestyle, I wish them all the best, and would help them in their journey.
Back to me. I identify as a bisexual woman. I have am forty-eight (forty-nine soon). I have had four sex partners in my life, starting at seventeen, two male, two female. I am now alone and live a quiet, (one might say boring) life. I have never done drugs or smoked or drank or done anything to harm myself or any others. A pound to a pile of horse manure, there are more LGBT people like me than the wild, partying, drugging, mad sex types mentioned in the survey.
You said; Furthermore, are you quite prepared to call out the hate-filled, religious zealots at the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association who spell out in painful detail that this is so? Are they all liars?
You know, I think you have the wrong idea about me. I don’t want to ‘call anyone’ out. I don’t know you. That’s why I want a grown-up respectful conversation with you. I am a liberal, which means, everyone should have a chance to speak, no one should be gagged.It’s just words.
In the past, I have challenged the left-wing Unite Against Fascism group and the Stop the War Coalition for their refusal to condemn homophobic behaviour in Muslims. I spoke up on behalf of that couple who owned that guest house who refused those gay men service because they had a right to refuse service. That is what liberal is all about.
Are you being sarcastic when you say The hate-filled religious zealots at the Gay and Lesbian Medical association? Are you making out I think religious are all hate-filled and zealots? I don’t.
Anyhow, I’ve gone on too long. You take care of yourself,J D Curtis. I wish you continued success in all you choose to do.
surely ‘Gay Left’ are not ‘Hate filled homophobes’? Or are they? Excuse me for being so bold, but I think you may mean ‘hate filled heterophobes’?
Perhaps nobody is ever cured of homosexuality like nobody is ever truly cured of alcoholism and it requires due diligence on the part of the person seeking conversion to avoid a relapse.
Wayne B. regularly derides those homosexuals that have left the lifestyle behind. Link
I do think ex-gays should be allowed to speak. Why not?
I might hold you to this statement the next time it comes up in a more timely and recent manner on this blog. I only warn you to prepare yourself for the onslaught of the ‘tolerance’ that will come your way when you refuse to tow the party line. Insofar as ‘great numbers’, the extensive list I put together on the above link was accomplished by merely a cursory internet search. Imagine if I actually tred.
I’ll tell you something, shall I? That link leads to a ‘worse case scenario’, having wild unprotected sex with anything that moves no matter the gender. Of course that is a dangerous, silly activity. Straight people do it, too
If you can provide just one link from a credible study that demonstrates anything close to the same percentages ingaging in such behavior betwen homo/hetero couples, I will concede the point. Good luck with that.
I have, however, know straight women, usually victims of childhood sex abuse by a male relative or neighbour, who indulge in such behaviour because they are taught that’s all they are worth
In such cases, it would be no small wonder that they would have trust issues insofar as intimacy is concerned with males.
A pound to a pile of horse manure, there are more LGBT people like me than the wild, partying, drugging, mad sex types mentioned in the survey
I would be willing to check out any reputable study you could provide on this subject.
Are you being sarcastic when you say The hate-filled religious zealots at the Gay and Lesbian Medical association?
Yes.
Are you making out I think religious are all hate-filled and zealots? I don’t
Great. The world could use more level-headed types like you that discuss these issues based on facts rather than attempting to stifle free speech with emotionally-charged, empty, name calling rhetoric.
JD:
There are no gay people that have “left the lifestyle.”
It’s a life, not a lifestyle, so you can save the propaganda. And what are your sources that show anyone has changed ?
Dude, John Smid has said he’s never met anyone who has changed. Alan Chambers puts the figure of failed “ex-gays ” at 99%. So, JD it appears you are are not being truthful and have an agenda.
JD:
Gay sex is not risky, unprotected sex is. Fundies are against measures to teach comprehensive sex education. They also oppose condoms and birth control. Thus, fundies create risky situations by pushing ignorance over education.
AIDS is mostly a heterosexual disease worldwide. Lesbian sex is less risky than heterosexuality. But I guess this doesn’t matter to you.
JD, you should come to this site with facts and common sense. You just aren’t very bright and are extremely dishonest.