I just want to add my two-cents to this, because it isn’t as complicated as the homophobes would like us all to believe.
‘Don’t Say Gay’ senator is asked to leave Tennessee restaurant
His [Stacy Campfield] hometown newspaper, the Knoxville News Sentinel, reported that on Sunday, Campfield walked into the Bistro at the Bijou restaurant for brunch and was told he wasn’t welcome by owner Martha Boggs.”He’s gone from being stupid to dangerous,” Boggs told the paper. “It’s just my way of standing up to a bully.”
I think we all knew what was coming next…
Campfield stood by his assertions in a blog post and mused about his treatment at the restaurant:
“I just figured this is just another example of the open minded tolerant left. They claim tolerances for divergent points of view…..Until someone actually has one. Then they don’t know how to handle it.”
This is the trope. If you can’t tolerate my hate mongering bigotry then you aren’t really so tolerant after all are you? But when you ask people to look the other way at hate mongering, at bigotry, you aren’t asking them to be tolerant. You are asking them to be indifferent.
Tolerance you see exists within a context of mutual respect and what gay people are really struggling for is respect. Maybe you personally think same-sex coupling is just a bit…weird. Maybe your religion forbids same-sex coupling. But at least respect our right to live our lives, according to our own human needs, according to our own judgement of what is moral, is righteous. Indifference on the other hand, means you don’t care.
You don’t care if gay kids kill themselves. You don’t care if gay people are beaten and murdered for being gay. You don’t care if same-sex couples are separated by deportation because they couldn’t get married. You don’t care if same-sex couples are kept apart at critical moments, such as emergency room visits, simply because they are gay. You don’t care if gay people are denied services, housing, a job, simply for being gay. You don’t care.
Bigots like Stacey Campfield, Brian Fischer, Tony Perkins, Maggie Gallagher and Brian Brown and others would like it very much if people didn’t care about the damage they do to their fellow Americans and to their country. Which is why they’re trying to redefine tolerance as indifference. But tolerance is not indifference. Tolerance helps a diverse community, a diverse nation, get along with itself. Indifference is rust on our common bonds as fellow Americans, as neighbors. That is why bigots like indifference.







Call the Wahhhhhhhhhbulance! My heart bleeds for this jerk–not. Wonder how it feels to be discriminated against the way he wants to discriminate against others?
It’s the classic misunderstanding of tolerance. Some think it must include tolerance of intolerance, but that is not the case. I love this a quote from the British philosopher, Karl Popper, which really clarified it for me:
“Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them…We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
Remember — this gay bashing political jerk Stacey Campfield doesn’t even want anybody legally to be able to *say* gay in a public school. And we should be asking — what penalty does his proposed law prescribe for violators? Just for saying “gay” or “homosexual” his law could get you thrown out of a public school. And he’s complaining that this restaurant owner doesn’t want him on her premises.
I am tolerant of Senator Campfield being as shrill of an ignorant hateful douchebag as he likes, and would not attempt to deny him that right by law. What I will not tolerate is his choice to codify his ignorant douchbaggery into law and hurt my LGBT friends. I accept that dopes like him exist, and I accept he has the same right to free speech as I have. I would even defend his right to speak freely. In other words, I do tolerate him. That doesn’t mean I have to socialize with him. That’s the difference between his intolerance of LGBT and and this restaurant owner’s refusal not to serve him in her restaurant. We all have choices, and she didn’t say he can’t say what he likes, just not in her presence or on her property. I wouldn’t attempt to abridge his right to be an idiot by law, but if he knocked on my door, I’d ask him to leave, because he has nothing to say to me in which I would be interested. People, especially right wingers, need to learn that with freedom comes consequences. Judgement goes two ways. Your right to speak freely doesn’t preclude me from my right to judge your speech idiotic. If I refuse to listen to your spew, that doesn’t make me intolerant of you, just selective about what I listen to.
Angry anti-gay activists demand the special right to refuse to serve customers, counsel students, sell to clients, or assist people based on their “conscience.” But when pro-equality Americans insist on the same right, strident anti-gay activists scream to high heaven! If the owner of this restaurant feels that homophobia is immoral or sinful, he/she has the same right to not serve the unrepentant homophobe based on his/her conscience. Sadly, this is the kind of anarchic society the pro-homophobia lobby wants–one where no one has to do their job if anything or anyone conflicts with their conscience.
Here’s the website to the restaurant. If I ever find myself in Knoxville, I’ll definitely spend some gay-tourist dollars there!
http://www.thebistroatthebijou.com/
Oh, take a look at the address. I thought that was *very* cool. :)
“I just figured this is just another example of the open minded tolerant left. They claim tolerances for divergent points of view…..Until someone actually has one. Then they don’t know how to handle it.”
And the RRRW is always clamoring for business owners to have the right to refuse service to anybody who violates their conscience. That is, of course, unless the person denied service happens to be a member of the RRRW. Then it’s suddenly a travesty of justice.
[...] RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL [...]