Rick Perlstein doesn’t think Mitt Romney’s Mormonism will ultimately matter to Evangelical voters, and I tend to agree. You should read the whole thing, but here’s how his piece starts:
I’ve never been impressed with the argument that Mitt Romney makes for a weak Republican nominee because conservatives don’t like him. That’s not how that party works. Like they say, “Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line.” Don’t believe me? Think back four years. When the race was still up in the air, the venom aimed at McCain was ten times worse than anything being suffered by Mitt. I collected the stuff back then: Rush Limbaugh said McCain threatened “the American way of life as we’ve always known it”; Ann Coulter said he was actually “a Democrat” (oof!); an article in the conservative magazine Human Events called him “the new Axis of Evil”; and Michael Reagan, talk radio host and the 40th president’s son, said “he has contempt for conservatives, who he thinks can be duped into thinking he’s one of them.”
Then McCain wrapped up the nomination, and Mike Reagan suddenly said, “You can bet my father would be itching to get out on the campaign trail working to elect him.” One thing Republicans understand: In American elections you have to choose from among only two people – not between the perfect and the good.
He adds a bit later:
I think they’ll get over it. In American religious history, theological qualms tend to get pushed aside when politics intervenes.
Consider that little more than a generation ago, Catholics had it even worse than Mormons do now. “Theological qualms”? Try this one on for size: Once upon a time many, if not most, Protestant fundamentalists identified the Roman Catholic Church as nothing less than the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth – the dreaded “Whore of Babylon” described in Revelation 17 and 18. More prosaically, they identified Catholics as an alien force. Billy Graham reassured his followers in 1960 that it was legitimate to vote against Catholic John F. Kennedy out of religious prejudice, because the Roman Catholic Church “is not only a religious but also a secular institution, with its own ministers and ambassadors.”
Fast forward to now: extremist Catholic voters and activists are in lockstep with extremist Evangelical voters and activists, because conservative religious people in this country, at least of the “Judeo-Christian” variety, have united about that which they hate.
It’s actually a little bit astonishing to look at how much American theology has changed in the past century. Rick’s piece looks back on that time not so long ago when Evangelicals really, honestly, didn’t care about abortion. For some of us who weren’t around in the 1970′s, it’s hard to imagine, but they used to consider that a Catholic issue and they kinda sorta totally hated Catholics. Now the enemies are gays, women, Muslims, etc. We’ll keep hearing the prognostication about whether Evangelicals will vote for a Mormon up to the day that Romney ties up the nomination. At that point, wingnuts, like they do, will fall in line.
[h/t Digby]










Um… No. Willard will be a victim of the same bigotted crowd he thought he could win over by being against same sex marriage. Anyone want to wager a bet? ;)
I totally agree with Perlstein. Fundagelicals want what they want and they absolutely hate President Obama (the love your enemies thing is very inconvenient at times). They will line up in lockstep with whomever will deliver them the Supreme Court. Just wait and see.
I’m an onlooker from the UK – I can’t believe the amount of religious bigotry that still exists in the US these days. I though the US Constitution allowed people freedom of religious belief – apparently not. It seems to me that not much has changed since the mobs ran the Mormons out of Missouri in the 1840′s.
I’m Mormon (you may be surprised that there are more of us these days outside the USA than inside) and I consider myself to be Christian. I have Jewis, Catholic, Muslim etc etc friends – our friendships are strengthened by those things we agree about, whilst we recognise and respect each others in things we disagree on. America…. isn’t it time you did the same?
Perhaps it might be a good idea to choose a Presidential candidate based on his ability to get the USA out of its financial and social mess, rather than basing your choice on the candidates belief system!
Agreed. Fundies will lock step (goose, usually) with anyone who assists them in perpetuating their fears, their hate, their prejudice(s)…make no mistake, the spiritually sickest of them all will vote for whatever the Republicans come up for President of the U.S.A. (lucky for us they only represent about 36% of the population)…these are sheep with sharp teeth.
Mormons are a base form of heresy. If it were not for the fact that there is a large group of (maybe to) religious conservatives that will eat into that 36% Leonardo. Thankfully. It is a big part of the reason traders give Obama a slightly better than 55% chance of re-election at this point (and yes, people place $ options on such things, and are seldom wrong. Putting your money on such an opinion tends to make people way more honest about where they put their vote)
Colin, Romney and people who think like him ARE the source of the social problems we have. Not the answer.
And Colin, I can sincerely consider myself a Scottish Lord. That does not make me one. Your cult has been consistantly anti gay (the $$$$$$ spent to fight gay marriage by Mormons was huge, but that was only the latest note in a symphony of bigotry), anti womans rights (LDS ‘church’ instrumental in fighting the passage of the ERA amendment), and was officially racist until it was obvious about a mere generation ago that would no longer fly, so it allowed African American men (not women! heavens no!) into the “priesthood”. It also supported polygamy, which has been shown to be very harmful to women until, AMAZINGLY, God said it should not be the case….right around the time the US Federal Government said polygamy had to go if Utah wanted statehood. How…convenient….
Don’t talk to us about bigotry when you follow a cult that wallows in it. Understood?
It won’t matter come election time. If Romney is the nominee, they’ll vote for him reluctantly because they hate Obama and the fact he’s an African-American. They too think he’s not a christian, a rite of passage if anyone wants to be taken seriously as a candidate for the presidency. No atheist would stand a chance, odd for a country that supposedly has separation of church and state. Makes me wonder at times. I just don’t see the relevance of one’s religion playing a major role in the democratic process of an election. To me, it has no place in politics.
Oh I remember growing up not able to talk to Catholics because they were all going to hell…but I think its funny how the Protestant religion came out of Catholism…mmm…if no Catholism then no Protestantism…as for the Mormon story well thats different…they are just as crazy as the Evangelicals…no difference in the craziness.