This is John King, from savewhitepeople.com, pleading with the people at the Kentuckiana Gay Pride Parade to save white people by not being so gay all the time. He is very upset! At one point, a lesbian comes to talk to him and he then complains to the camera that he “just got called a dumbass by a dyke.” Yes, yes, you did, John. I imagine you’re about to be mocked by a lot more LGBT people and our allies.
By the way, John, a majority of the American public supports marriage equality. Drives you nuts, doesn’ t it?
Also, read Jesus’ General, for more laughs.
You’ve done nothing of the sort NBF. Your need to call people names when they call out your lies proves that. You have said nothing truthful since this all started and if the admins weren’t asleep at the wheel you would have been banned at your first post.
@RainbowPhoenix: Translation: “I can’t actually expose any lies this racist b*****d has told, but since he’s unpopular in this tiny, smegma-smeared corner of the internet, I think I can get away with calling his opinions lies…” ;o)
That’s another lie NBF. This is starting to look pathological.
Goodness. A really stupid homophobic racist. How surprising.
at first, NBF was good for a laugh. Some of his comments (yeah, bring up Russia, a dying land, and Greece…there are two success stories to copy) are hilarous. But, we should not mock this man this much.
Evan is right. He is really, really stupid.
So is John King.
We have to pity them, really.
What truly great American, white or otherwise, was an anti semite?
What great man, or woman, of any race, used such language when responding to people?
They are…small. Small in manliness, small in their minds, small in every way.
I pity them both.
Males (I wont call them Men) who think and act like these two never got to fight in a battlefield (whatever one thinks of our wars) with MEN like Colin Powell.
Males who think like them have nothing better to do than to go and bother people at Gay pride parades. They are not founding cutting edge software companies south of San Francisco. Or if religious, building a health clinic with people of all races in the delta or lilly white Appalachia, where I am from, but which I can attest is hardly an example of “white success”, lilly white as most of it is.
Males like them are not building up great things, or spending their afternoons building a house for habitat for humanity.
Men (and Women) build other people up. All people.
These sad, whiny males…not men at all, have….failed.
they have failed at being men.
That, that is just sad folks.
It is a waste, and it is sad.
And, like the failures at being men they are, all they got to come back with is insults. Further proving their point.
What will their sons think, when they look around them someday and encounter a Real Man? A fireman who is white but saves a black lady from a fire, then goes home to his quiet dignified life with his loving African American wife and honor student kids?
They will look at the fathers..mere males, not men, and know nothing but shame.
We should not laugh at NBF and John King…we must pity them.
@Gene: “What truly great American, white or otherwise, was an anti semite?”
Here ya go, scumbag!
Thomas Jefferson (Notes on Virginia): “Dispersed as the Jews are, they still form one nation, FOREIGN TO THE LAND THEY LIVE IN.”
Harry S.Truman (Diary entry for July 21, 1947): “The Jews I find are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as Displaced Persons as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler or Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog”.
H.L. Mencken: “The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of.” “The rage of the Jews against anti-Semitism is often only a thin veneer of anti-Goyism. They both hate and disdain the Goy.”
Henry Adams (Descendant of President John Adams)in a letter to John Hay, October 1895: “The Jewish question is really the most serious of our problems.”
“What will their sons think, when they look around them someday and encounter a Real Man? A fireman who is white but saves a black lady from a fire, then goes home to his quiet dignified life with his loving African American wife and honor student kids?”
BWAHAHAHA!!
@Evan Hurst: “Homophobia” is a b******t smear word coined by fags and propagated by the judenpresse. “Phobia” means “fear”. I’m not afraid of you creatures (although I will concede that any accidental contact with your deadly body fluids would scare the hell out of me); I LOATHE & DESPISE you because you not only refuse to acknowledge that you’re freaks of nature, you insist on rubbing the faces of disgusted straights in your perversion.
Come up with a word that accurately describes that natural, widespread aversion and I’ll accept it.
Seriously, why hasn’t NBF been banned yet? This has gone beyond ridiculous and I’ve seen people banned for much less.
Yeah, RainbowPhoenix, you’re right. I’ve been away.
The poor thing is just ignorant. Gene’s points are salient, though. NBF is the kind of person who, when he dies, will be remembered by virtually no one.
Anyway, he’s banned.
By the way, though, his “NBF” was a reference to Nathan Bedford Forrest.
He’s even more pathetic than we thought. You can’t comment anymore, NBF, but we’ll bid you farewell by noting that you’re supporting traitors to our country, traitors who, um, haha, totally lost the war.
;-) Good day! Enjoy stocking your shelves and fantasizing about guns or whatever it is you do with your time.
@ John King (“we are all part of a symbiotic circle, ya perhaps we’re all part of the creators plane, and no one has the right to destroy what the creator brought into the world.”)
Look you even said it, and yet your antigay.
gay people are here the same way your here, we were BORN..
Just like the color of one’s skin, they didn’t get a choice and gay people didn’t get a choice to be gay or not. your just.. a hypocrite, racist and a Bigot.. your not worried white people are going extinct your worried that your fellow White Hypocrites, racist and Bigots are going extinct. so ya maybe just maybe when all you hypocrite, racist and Bigots go Extinct the world will be a lot more loveing, caring, and understanding of other people and the right they have to LIVE.. R.I.P. hypocrites, racist and Bigots. I am White and I am PROUD I AM GAY. Sounds like your not even PROUD your not GAY.
Wow, kooks and trolls–did some crazy white supremacist freak show website direct people here?
dude, Evan he couldn’t even troll correctly he’s a tryhard.
NBF– homophobia is not the fear of homosexuals. I’m not A scary guy.
Homophobia is the fear the you, yourself, might be homosexual. You ARE a scary guy.
Wow
Argumentative Racist and NBF are ANGRY!
Not only that, but they are quite wonderfully, spectacularly out-of-this-world BONKERS.
Somewhere there are a few men in long (white) coats brandishing outsized butterfly nets and tranquilizer guns, looking for these cretins.
Man I wish there was a steve Irwin like dude…
who discovered the most batshit crazy humans out there with his style of reporting
g*****n jump jacks
NBF should’ve been nice to me, I’m white :P
Oh right, I’m a white person who disagrees with him, which makes me a Jew, or faggot, or pinko or something or other. So I’m not the right kind of white person, obviously. Sigh..
NBF said “queers make up 1-3% of the population – but commit over 30% of the child molestations.”.
That’s a lie. People who say they are not heterosexual make up 10% of the population and while its true that in 30% of molestations the child is the same sex as the molester, those molesters are not from the 10% of the population that says it is not heterosexual, they are from the 90% of the population that says it IS heterosexual. Virtually all molestations where the perpetrator is the same sex as the victim are done by someone who is in a heterosexual relationship and who says they are a heterosexual. So either 1/3 of the population that says they are heterosexual is lying and actually gay, or virtually 100% of child molestations are committed by heterosexuals regardless of the gender of the perpetrator and victim.
Seems to be a lot of anti-White venom on this page. I notice not one of you “pro diversity” proponents addressed any of the other commentators questions. I’ll give you all another shot.
Do you agree that all races, blacks, Whites and Asians have the right to their own unique living spaces for the preservation of their people? Or do you ONLY think that White people in EVERY country have to be flooded with other races and force assimilated aka genocide?
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White
Alice dear, instead of a push poll, how about alternative #3.
Race is no more important that sexual orientation, and a lot more benign than religion or. National origin.
I frankly don’t care about it. I’m not anti white, being white. I am anti prejudice, being a caring human being.
Alice “Silly” Rabbit asked:
“Do you agree that all races, blacks, Whites and Asians have the right to their own unique living spaces for the preservation of their people?”
Most emphatically NO!!!!
A “right to their own unique living spaces” means at the expense and the exclusion of other races.
No-one should be excluded from anywhere they want to go merely on the basis of the colour of their skin. That’s called RACISM.
And as for “the preservation of their people” – they are all human. That’s all you need know.
Let me ask you something, Alice “Silly” Rabbit – what exactly do you hope to gain, what it it that you hope will happen by keeping keeping the various racial differences ‘pure’? How exactly do you envisage this benefiting the human race as a whole.
And how would you define ‘purity’? How would you tell?
My partner looks mediterranean, maybe Greek or Italian, with olive skin and curly black hair. However his full biological sister has pale skin and straight mousy hair. (They are actually both 1/4 Jamaican.) If you did not know they were siblings you might assume they were from completely different ethnic backgrounds. But, of course, they are not.
In short, what you espouse is stupid, unrealistic, unjustified, wilfully ignorant, unimplementable, evil and just plain wrong.
Silly Rabbit.
Alice asked “Do you agree that all races, blacks, Whites and Asians have the right to their own unique living spaces for the preservation of their people?”.
No group has the right to exclude any other group from any part of the planet. Keeping the races apart and re-inforcing division is a BAD idea and I am 100% opposed. Its irrelevant if the races mix and everyone becomes brown, our humanity is what matters, not the “preservation” of any particular skin colour. I don’t give a damn about “preserving” the white “race” and I am white as well.
Are all these racist kooks commenting here actually different people or are they all the same person just commenting under different names? They’re all equally idiotic.
@ “Peter Hargmier” so you are saying that you would have no problem whatsoever with Africa opening up its borders and Whites, Asians, Arabs etc. flooding there in their millions? So much so that Black children became minorities in Africa? You are fine with Black children being minorities in every African school? You are promoting Black people assimilated and subsumed by the millions of non Blacks? You are promoting the “inevitable mixed race” future in Africa? That sounds to me like you are really promoting the end of Black people in Africa! You sound anti-Black AS WELL as anti-White. I think you are BSing but i think you need to explain yourself.
I am White however so i shall ask you this. Why are YOU arguing a position that puts us in a world with no more White children?
@ “Priya Lynn” ahhhh another mixed race supremacist. I think you too are BSing.
Can you confirm your position for me? Are saying that you would have no problem whatsoever with EVERY Asian opening up its borders and Blacks, Whites, Mexicans etc. flooding there in their millions? So much so that Asian children became minorities in every last Asian? You are fine with Asian children being minorities in every Asian school? You are promoting Asian people assimilated and subsumed by the millions of non Asians? You are promoting the “inevitable mixed race” future in Asia? That sounds to me like you are really promoting the end of Asian people in Asia! You sound anti-Asian AS WELL as anti-White. I think you are BSing but i think you need to explain yourself.
I am White however so i shall ask you this. Why are YOU arguing a position that puts us in a world with no more White children?
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White
Alice
Did the human race not start out as one race? Or were there multiple Adams and Eves, one set for each different “race”?
Alice said ““Priya Lynn” ahhhh another mixed race supremacist”.
LOL, I’m for treating all races equally so that makes me a race supremacist – good one. You’re messed up Alice.
Alice asked “Are saying that you would have no problem whatsoever with EVERY Asian opening up its borders and Blacks, Whites, Mexicans etc. flooding there in their millions?”.
I’m not sure if there should be limits on the number of imigrants countries allow inside their borders, but what I am certain of is that one of the criteria for entering a country should NEVER be race. There may be legitimate reasons to restrict the number of new imigrants, but it wouldn’t be any less of a problem if millions of whites flooded into the States than millions of blacks or asians, the problem is more people than a country can accomodate, not the colour of the people comming in.
You want to be a bigot and “preserve” the white race, no one is stopping you from breeding prolifically with only white people. If your goal is more white people no one is stopping you racists from achieving that. If you can’t win enough whites to your bigoted side and blacks and asians out breed whites that’s just TFB and it wouldn’t matter if it was whites outbreeding blacks and Asians, “preserving” skin colours and differences between humans is NOT a worthwhile goal, its destructive, increases strife and war and ultimately harms everyone.
Go ahead and breed until your uterus falls out, but you’ll NEVER have a right to exclude any race from any part of the planet if I have anything to say about it.
Alice said “Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White”.
No, anti-racism is indifference to skin colour. “Preserving the white race” is a code phrase for anti-black, anti-asian and white supremacy.
Alice, assume for a minute that you can have what you want and divide the planet up into race boundaries. How are you going to decide who gets what part of the planet? What if the other races don’t agree with you that whites should get all the prime real estate? You do realize that the Indians were in North America first and by that criterion all the white people would have to leave the United States and go back to England, France, and so on. Are you prepared to pack up and leave the States in order to have your racist Utopia?
@ Priya Lynn I skimmed your tl,dr comment and noticed that not ONCE did you clearly answer my question. I will ask this do you directly another time.
Can you confirm you have NO PROBLEM with Black people being replaced in ALL of Africa with a mixed race population? Of course this is NOT happening in EVERY African country (it is happening in EVERY White country though) but i am curious to see if you are consistent in your genocidal views.
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White. How can it not?! You so called anti-racists ALWAYS argue a position that puts us in a world with no more White children. How MORE anti-White can you get! The label sticks buddy-you are anti-White AND promoting the genocide of my race.
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White
Priya
I got “corrected” on this same point about Native Americans on this thread a few days ago. I was told that indeed the white people were in North America first. Google “Solutreans” or “Solutrean hypothesis” if you want a good laugh…
@ PhilipJ
How about we flood the whole of Africa with non Blacks and ask any sane Black man that objects “Did the human race not start out as one race? Or were there multiple Adams and Eves, one set for each different “race”?”
Nope, i don’t think would work to obfuscate the real issue that we are trying to genocide Blacks in Africa via mass immigration and assimilation. Do you?
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White
@ Priya Lynn Ahh as usual (and this is VERY typical of anti-Whites) you can quite CLEARLY recognize that what happened the Indians in America was genocide but then they try to deny that what is happening White people in EVERY last White country on this earth is NOT genocide. Two wrongs don’t make a right Priya. Why are you trying to justify genocide today because of events from the past
Why the double standards? You really can’t help yourself can you LOL
People like you agree on two things. What is non Whites belongs to non-Whites. What is Whites ALSO belongs to non-Whites are MUST be shared. Therefore NOTHING belongs to White people.
YOU prove every time you type you are anti-White
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White
Hey Priya, i think you’ll like this short animation its called “How Whites Took Over America.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdFWNlHsIwE
Remember there is only one race the human race ;-)
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White
Alice, I answered your questions in my comment. You skimmed it because you were afraid if you took time to actually consider it you wouldn’t be able to logically dispute what I said – your fear was well founded. You want the answer to your question, stifle your fear of admitting you’re wrong and go back and actually read my comment.
Alice said “Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White. How can it not?!”.
It is not because anti-racism is indifferent to skin colour. It is you who wants to set up a land where whites reign supreme and you can command all others to leave – you are a white supremacist.
Alice said “You so called anti-racists ALWAYS argue a position that puts us in a world with no more White children.”.
Nonsense. We argue a position where skin colour is never a criterion in law anywhere and what happens with the races after that is irrelevant. If that ends with the white race dying out, the black or asian race dying out, or the races remaining as they are is not a matter we are concerned with.
Phillip, I did look up solutreans, yes, it was good for a laugh, no evidence to support it, the desperation of racists to claim an exclusive right to a land they have no exclusive claim to.
Alice said “you can quite CLEARLY recognize that what happened the Indians in America was genocide”.
I never said any such thing – you’re messed up.
Alice said “but then they try to deny that what is happening White people in EVERY last White country on this earth is NOT genocide. Two wrongs don’t make a right Priya. Why are you trying to justify genocide today because of events from the past”.
Its your “logic” that demands white people leave North America, not mine. On what basis do you propose to decide which race gets what land on the planet? Are you prepared to pack up and leave North America to cram into England? If not then how can you justify asking other races to do that?
Alice said “Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White.”
Anti-racism is indifference to skin colour. “Preserving the white race” is a code phrase for anti-black, anti-asian and white supremacy.
I’ll tell ya what, Priya. I’ll stop having sex with men, but then I will only have sex – and have children with – African-American women, Asian women, Native American women, etc – ANYONE but Caucasian women. (I’m white, by the way).
I’ve got an even better idea, Priya. I don’t think Alice would object that I keep having sex with men, AS LONG AS I knock up a few white women on the way. I don’t see how Alice can object to that; she’s getting what she wants, more white children being born.
@ Priya Lynn-I skimmed it because it was the usual anti-White diatribe i see anti-Whites like you posting over and over again. All anti-White dogma EVER boils down to is some variation of the White race is evil AND it doesn’t exist (LOL, i love that one) so therefore the genocide of the White race is not possible. You are simply promoting White genocide by TRYING to imply it doesn’t exist.
Yet again you prove for me time and time again that anti-Racism is a code word for anti-White
And yet MORE anti-White diatribe here. ““Preserving the white race” is a code phrase for anti-black, anti-asian and white supremacy.” So any White person that wants to preserve the White race is “bad”? LOL How more anti-White can you be? Are Black people who want to preserve the Black race also “evil racist, Black supremacist bigots”? How about Asian people that want to preserve the Asians? Are they also hate filled bigots for wanting this? Or are you REALLY anti-Asian, anti-Blacks and anti-White? You sound like a genocidal freak! YOU are the one here that wants the genocide it seems of all races! Thats pretty sick! Why are you arguing this position? Why do you promote a world with no more White children? (i’ll focus on the White race because i am White but i am sure any normal Black or Asian man will equally interested on what you have to say about their races future!)
PS-Still waiting on you to clearly state if you have no problem with Black people in Africa being genocided via mass immigration and assimilation? We’ll call this “diversity” and “integration” and “desegregation” but between you are me they are all code words for genocide.
No Alice, you did not skim my comment for that reason, you didn’t read it so you don’t know what it contains. You didn’t read it because you knew in your heart a detailed look at your arguments would show them to be irrational, illogical, and evil.
I answered your question in my previous comment to you. If you really wanted an answer you’d go back and read it but of course you really don’t want an answer, you’re afraid of a rational and honest back and forth, instead preferring to shout bumper sticker slogans.
It is you who did not answer my questions:
Assume for a minute that you can have what you want and divide the planet up into race boundaries. How are you going to decide who gets what part of the planet? What if the other races don’t agree with you that whites should get all the prime real estate? You do realize that the Indians were in North America first and by that criterion all the white people would have to leave the United States and go back to England, France, and so on. Are you prepared to pack up and leave the States in order to have your racist Utopia?
Anti-racism is indifference to race. “Preserving the white race” is a code phrase for anti-black, anti-asian and white supremacy.”
So, Priya, let me see if I understand this -
Because I don’t believe that whites are superior to all other races, I’m anti-white..
that’s all I’m getting out of the “conversation” so far :-)
Yes, that’s what I’ve gotten out of it as well Phillip. And Alice wants an answer to her questions but she won’t read the answers and that makes her angry because she wants an answer to her questions.
No Priya, i went back and read it again, twice now actually. Its just the usual anti-White diatribe using your little control words like “supremacist”, “bigot” and so on. Stock, anti-White bread and butter response that attempts to obfuscate the main point with strawmen arguments. All you are doing here is TRYING to justify genocide. You are TRYING to justify the genocide of my race.
Now Priya, answer some questions.
1. Why so you support EVERY White countries and ONLY White countries to be flooded with other races and force assimilated? Why do you promote these genocidal policies?
2. Regarding the Tibetans? Are you saying they were wrong in claiming Genocide when the Chinese tried mass immigration and assimilation in Tibet? I seem to remember the anti-Racists supporting the Tibetans? Why was that? Because they are not White perhaps? Why the double standards?
3.I think i have asked this one about FOUR TIMES now. You have not answered this, you just duck and dive around it. Maybe you can give me a simple yes or no here? Do you have no problem with Black people in Africa being genocided via mass immigration and assimilation? We’ll call this “diversity” and “integration” and “desegregation” but between you are me they are all code words for genocide? Don’t dodge the question with BS attempts at semantics. Answer it!
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White, just because you CLAIM to be against all forms of racism does NOT stop it being anti-White. You anti-racist argue positions that put us in a world with no more White children. You can’t get more anti-White than that. ;-)
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White.
PhilipJ , the best you can do is attempt the tired old “supremacist” smear here. NO ONE is saying any race is superior. All i want is for all races to continue to exist.
However anti-racists are in a sense White supremacists. They like to imply if we have countries only for White people then we will start to colonize the non Whites again. Anti-racists justify the genocide of the White race because they seem to think we are responsible collectively for all evils know to man. LOL I love how anti-racist “logic” has so many holes in it.
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White
You know, there are races and tribes of people that are indeed threatened and needy of preservation. You’ll find them in Africa and I think Latin America, they are indigenous people being crowded out by settlers. On a planet of 7 billion people, how many of them are white? I don’t know the numbers but if it was only in the millions, you’d have to be incredibly delusional to think we’re in any danger of being wiped out. I mean, really, it amazes me. Where does this come from? The fact that population rates are booming in African and Asian countries and not in European countries? Sorry, there’s still no case to be made because we’re far more well off than people in a lot of Asian and African countries. Most of our children don’t die before they’re five. This ‘white genocide’ argument doesn’t hold for a second. It’s laughable.
Poor Alice…poor ‘the whole racist lot’ of them.
When they talk of pure races, it’s just showing how uninformed they are about their own heritage. Even white Europe is a melting pot. Anglo Saxons in England have Saxon (Germanic heritage). The Irish and English and Scots and Dutch and Germans all have Celtish ancestry, and Celts at one time spread all the way to Turkey. We are all mixed, even if we do not realize it.
But, the big question is, SO?
So?
Its artificial, really. We have different blood types. Anyone calling for those trashy O positive b******s to learn their place and go home? And those sluty B negatives! The NERVE they have wanting to marry my daughter! No…we cannot SEE blood type. And it is a real difference..but, a minor one, like skin color.
Skin, we can see, and at times we have as groups treated each other like crap because of it. But, one fact remains that DESTROYS racists.
We are all one race, as you say yourself. The fact is, a white man, and a black woman, can sexually reproduce. That is the classic biological definition of two individuals being of one species.
Why would we want to be separate Alice? We are not, on the level that matters, different. As you said yourself, we are all one race!
From a religious standpoint (of every religion I know of, the idea is outright sinful. Even the southern baptists have as of yesterday a Black leader)
From a pure biological and non religious standpoint, it makes no sense either.
This all begs the questions…
Why do you mistakenly think White people are special?
Why do you mistakenly think white skin needs preserving?
and most importantly,
What happened to you that makes you so weak, so lacking in a sense of your worth as an individual, as a woman of value and inherent dignity, that you must seek identity with this group? With racists?
Does it give an empty life a sense purpose? Does it make the other failures in your life seem less glaring when you get to mistakenly see your group (white people)and yourself as victims?
Does it make you feel fulfilled to focus on this, vs. the other goals in life that successful people try to fulfill, but, you have not been able to do so?
Just curious.
The now banned loser did something I expected. He mentioned a reprobate, spend thrift, slave owning, rapist, bill evading, elitist, homophobe, a man who died in debt after demanding to live a life of luxury paid for by others, a man who freed his slaves in his will thus finanaicially ruining his family (who, since their fortne was based on slavery, deserved ruin) but did not have the balls to do it during his own lifetime and not live in comfort.
He referred to the a*s, Thomas Jefferson.
I said GREAT man…Thomas Jefferson was not one. Period. That he had anti semitic thughts is no surprise.
Sorry if I deflated anyone childhood fantasies or ruined a planed trip to Montecello (he had good taste…people spending other peoples money often do) but facts a fact.
Neither were the others you mentioned. As History has recorded.
Priya, I am impressed, I must say…just curious…are you employed in law, or a related field?
Alice said “Now Priya, answer some questions.”.
Say “Please” – you’re not the boss of me.
Alice said “I think i have asked this one about FOUR TIMES now. You have not answered this, you just duck and dive around it. Maybe you can give me a simple yes or no here? Do you have no problem with Black people in Africa being genocided via mass immigration and assimilation?”.
I did answer it you moron, you just refuse to see it. That is not a “yes” or “no” question, that’s a false dichotomy and the logical fallacy of “Begging the question.”. Here once again is the answer from my previous comments which you ignored/didn’t read:
“I’m not sure if there should be limits on the number of imigrants countries allow inside their borders, but what I am certain of is that one of the criteria for entering a country should NEVER be race. There may be legitimate reasons to restrict the number of new imigrants, but it wouldn’t be any less of a problem if millions of whites flooded into the States than millions of blacks or asians, the problem is more people than a country can accomodate, not the colour of the people comming in…We argue a position where skin colour is never a criterion in law anywhere and what happens with the races after that is irrelevant. If that ends with the white race dying out, the black or asian race dying out, or the races remaining as they are is not a matter we are concerned with.”
Now, if we’re going to have a productive debate there needs to be give and take. That means when you ask a question, I answer it (which I obviously did) and then I ask you a question and you answer it. Now before I answer the other questions you asked out of turn in your last comment to me, fair rules of debate require that you answer my questions I put to you several comments ago:
“Assume for a minute that you can have what you want and divide the planet up into race boundaries. How are you going to decide who gets what part of the planet? What if the other races don’t agree with you that whites should get all the prime real estate? You do realize that the Indians were in North America first and by that criterion all the white people would have to leave the United States and go back to England, France, and so on. Are you prepared to pack up and leave the States in order to have your racist Utopia?”
Now, are you going to answer my questions as fair rules of debate call for, or are you just going to be an ignorant blowhard and repeat the same tired rants you have up until now?
Anti-racism is indifference to race. “Preserving the white race” is a code phrase for anti-black, anti-asian and white supremacy.”
I’ll be back in a few hours anti-Whites.
Oh and haven’t you heard?! Everyone who has grown out of their education is saying that anti-racism is a code word for anti-White.
Gene asked “Priya, I am impressed, I must say…just curious…are you employed in law, or a related field?”.
Thanks Gene. Other than a class I took one semester in grade 12 I have no law training. My background is in computer science.