Anyone who’s been paying attention knows that Mitt Romney — who expediently claimed to support LGBT rights while running for office in Massachusetts and famously promised to be better for gay rights than Ted Kennedy — has a long history of anti-LGBT bigotry (including bullying) and has worked very hard to fight the progress of equality, both during his tenure as Governor of Massachusetts and in his efforts to court suspicious social conservatives during his bids for the presidency.
Last week, two progressive groups — the Courage Campaign SuperPAC and American Bridge 21st Century — launched a new web campaign called “Mitt Gets Worse,” a play on words meant to echo sex columnist and activist Dan Savage’s enormously successful “It Gets Better” project. The video campaign intends to highlight Romney’s extreme anti-LGBT agenda by publishing testimonies from people who have firsthand experience dealing with Romney on issues of LGBT equality.
And its first video is a doozy. It features Julie Goodridge, who was a co-lead plaintiff in the landmark case Goodridge v. Department of Public Health. In 2003 — during Mitt Romney’s term as Governor of Massachusetts — that state’s Supreme Court decided the case in favor of the plaintiffs, marking the first time in history that an American state supreme court recognized the right of same-sex couples to marry.
Goodridge’s story is compelling. When she gave birth to her daughter Annie in 1995, there were severe complications. Annie was rushed to the intensive care unit, so Goodridge’s then-partner Hillary followed in order to be with their child. When Hillary tried to return to her partner’s bedside, she was denied entry into the recovery room because she was not recognized as Goodridge’s next of kin. Distraught, Hillary then attempted to rejoin their daughter in the ICU, but was barred from seeing her daughter because she wasn’t regarded as the infant’s “real mother.”
Naturally, as one of Massachusetts’ highest-profile LGBT activists, Julie Goodridge spent an awful lot of time educating her fellow citizens about why marriage matters to same-sex couples. A self-described optimist, Goodridge and other equality supporters sought to meet with Governor Romney because they thought, in her words, that “if we can change the minds of all of these citizens in Massachusetts. . . we can talk to the governor.”
According to Goodridge, Governor Romney initially refused to grant the group any time whatsoever. She alleges that Romney only relented under pressure from the media, and that when the meeting finally did occur, it was ”truthfully the most frustrating experience that [she] had in the entire marriage case. . . both [Goodridge and her partner] had some pretty frustrating conversations, but this one took the cake.” The governor allegedly acted as though he didn’t know who they were, despite the fact that they were plaintiffs in a landmark case, essentially setting the tone for the rest of the meeting.
However, it’s what Goodrich says happened at the end of that meeting that chilled this blogger to the bone:
“I looked [Romney] in the eye as we were leaving the meeting, and I said in exasperation, ‘Governor Romney, tell me: what would you suggest I say to my eight-year-old daughter about why her mommy and her ma can’t get married? Because you, the governor of her state, is going to block our marriage.’ And he looked at me, and he said — kind of looked over my shoulder with this blank stare and said — ‘I don’t really care what you tell your adopted daughter. Why don’t you just tell her what you’ve been telling her for the last eight years?’” (emphasis added)
I was so shocked by the sheer disdain in Romney’s remarks that I literally gasped as I listened to Julie Goodrich recount them. She continued:
“I have never in my life stood before someone who had no capacity for empathy like Mitt Romney. He didn’t care about my daughter, he didn’t care about what we should tell her, all he cared about was his political future and blocking our rights to get married.”
For the record, Truth Wins Out does not endorse political candidates or parties of any kind. However, as an organization dedicated to fighting anti-LGBT extremism, we will absolutely not hesitate to condemn those extremists wherever we find them, and this includes politicians of all stripes. Mitt Romney’s mistreatment of Julie Goodridge and her family betrays his true feelings toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: utter contempt for our lives and our families, and detached indifference to the suffering, discrimination, and injustice that we bear.
And that — regardless of one’s political opinion of Mitt Romney — should send chills up the spine of every equality-minded person in America.
Watch Julie Goodridge’s testimony below:










Romney is a sociopath. He is physically incapable of feeling empathy or compassion for other people.
I believe you’re right, Steve. Sociopaths are not only often criminals, they’re often the most successful of business people.
Corporate, religious and political leadership really reward sociopathic behavior like nothing else. The ruthlessness is an asset there.
Seriously, look up the symptoms. They fit to a T, right down the bullying in college and the animal cruelty.
Priya Lynn, I’m not sure there’s much difference between “criminal” and “successful business(wo)man”.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say Mitt Romney is incapable of empathy. But he does seem to put expediency above just about everything else. And I would also say he is and has always been a bit too used to getting what he wants–SRKS (Spoiled Rich Kid Syndrome). And about six decades worth of it, too.
Why should Romney be interested in being used by homosexual activists to promote same sex attractions? Recent studies have shown beyond the shadow of a doubt, that children of same sex couples suffer in many areas, due to the unnatural relationship and the lack of a parent, be it a real mother, or a real father in their lives. To the natural family members, homosexuals being able to adopt children or thrust them into a same sex family group is viewed as “Children as Pets”.
@Paul: You must be quoting that recent conservative organization study (soory, the name of it has already gone clear out of my head, because really, the study is irrelevant), that uses cherry-picked information to paint a false picture. I’m sure the other readers know the one I’m talking about. Don’t worry, a more complete study will soon come about to set you straight (pun intended). :)
Ah, REGNERUS! That’s the name, it just came back to me.
Or is it “ignoramus”?
wow, I am not gay, but I am believer in human rights, and I believe it is such a shame that there are laws preventing 2 consenting adults to marry if they wish to do so, this idiot man Matt Romney will regret his words and his deeds someday I am sure. and Hopefully will NEVER be a President of the United States, thank you for speaking out and telling us your story. hugs xx at one time there were laws that forced an African-American to give up his or her seat on a city bus to any white person,,,,this was change and horrible laws preventing any consenting adults to marry will change as well I hope and pray
Paul the Regnerus study out of the Univ of Texas Austin is deeply flawed, it is jsut more junk science. The Witherspoon Institute paid $875,000 for it, but it is roundly getting smacked down by Regnerus’ peers. NOM et al thought they had the winning card, LOL, they just blew $875,000. Regnerus never found Mommy+Mommy or Daddy+Daddy and he admits that to me in e-mails he asked me to post.
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/11/45557#comment-125929
He is facing a Scientific Misconduct Inquiry from his University. We’ll see if at the end, they convert it to a full blown Ethics Investigation. Regnerus’ hands are dirty.
If you are going to fight us in this Culture War you are going to have to come armed with the TRUTH, because we WILL expose your lies and dirty tricks. Penalties will be paid.
It is too bad that you have decided that giving your all for the Democratic party is more important than your child or anything else. What happened to you could have happened to anyone. Even a married couple. When my daughter had a baby my son in law was denied access to the newborn ward where she was staying because he had taken the yellow wristband that identified him as a new father off his wrist when he went to work. Did he demand a meeting with Jerry Brown? No, he talked to the proper people at the hospital who were only doing their job and trying to make sure that there were no kidnappings at the hospital. I am really tired of these made up exaggerated pieces of nonsense being pushed by the left about all of the supposedly oppressed. Sorry. I don’t buy it.
[...] Read more Share this:FacebookPrintEmail This entry was posted in National News & Politics and tagged gay marriage, marriage equality, Mitt Romney, same-sex marriage by Victoria. Bookmark the permalink. [...]
@ Susan, You missed the point even as you gave me the answer to your post. Your son-in-law was ISSUED a new parent ID that he tossed away. Goodrich’s partner didn’t have that opportunity. Really? Wake up and smell the oppression under your own nose.
What is done to one is done to all. That means until everyone enjoys the same rights, no one does.
Susan, are you really that misinformed? Comparing your son-in-law taking off his ID to people who aren’t even given the opportunity? Are you really this ignorant? I have to think it must be willfull that you would be so stupid to come on this site and make such a thoughtless comparison.
Susan Salisbury, use your brain. Did you go to school?
The lack of critical thinking skills in this country is appalling.
Oops, my bad. It’s Goodridge, not Goodrich.
My point is still valid.
@ Susan. Are you really that dense? Or just willfully ignorant. A same sex parent that is not the actual birth parent was not given the “new parent” ID. How can she take off what she didn’t have in the first place. Your repsonse shows ignorance of the realities life for same sex couples in many places and a lack of empathy. I suggest you educate yourself.
@Susan,
You really can’t tell the difference between someone being required to prove who he is because he chose to take his bracelet off VS someone being told her relationship with her family is invalid?
[...] the rights of LGBT people to be protected from bullying, to marry the person they love, and to start families. No, his enmity towards us is so deeply pervasive and so viciously fervent that he has no problem [...]
[...] Barney Frank also blasted the Log Cabin Republicans in a video statement given to the “Mitt Gets Worse” [...]
[...] it several times between now and November 6. We all should — we can never allow ourselves to forget just how important this upcoming election is for the LGBT community. 2012 electionBarack [...]