Today, the New York Times ran a profile written by Erik Eckholm about infamous anti-equality crusader Frank Schubert (left), a former corporate public relations executive who now devotes his life to denying LGBT people the freedom to marry. Schubert was tapped in 2008 to run the successful campaign to pass California’s Proposition 8, which stripped the marriage rights of same-sex couples, and he has had his hands in every marriage discrimination ballot initiative since.
Schubert isn’t nearly as well-known as Maggie Gallagher or Brian Brown, but he’s every bit as dangerous. He’s brilliant at crafting campaign messaging, his brand of anti-LGBT bigotry is subtler and more insidious than most other proponents of marriage discrimination (read: broader mainstream appeal), and he’s totally ruthless: he lays low and works through surrogates in the conservative political and faith communities for most of the campaign, then jumps in full-force at the last minute, flooding the airwaves with smiling children accompanied by ominous (and factually inaccurate) warnings about how much they’ll be harmed if marriage discrimination isn’t enshrined in the constitution. Remember the infamous “Princess” ad from the Prop 8 campaign? (If not, watch it below.) It was masterminded by Frank Schubert.
If you’re passionate about and/or engaged in the fight for marriage equality, you need to read Eckholm’s profile and get to know Frank Schubert.
From the NYT article:
Gay rights leaders despise Mr. Schubert, who has devoted himself to the issue in recent years, for what they call his misleading arguments. They have also learned to fear him for messages that are less openly harsh than those voiced by many other opponents of gay rights: a strategy aimed at reassuring the moderate voters who decide such elections that barring gays and lesbians from marriage does not make them bigots.
Citing polls showing growing public acceptance and armed with more than $25 million, gay rights leaders hope to win their first ballot victory for same-sex marriage on Nov. 6. But they are bracing for a rush of Schubert-designed television ads in the four contested states.
“Everyone has a right to love who they choose,” says an ad now running in Minnesota, “but nobody has a right to redefine marriage.”
It’s abundantly clear that Schubert, who makes his living designing slick PR campaigns intended to make Americans feel comfortable casting a vote that hurts their LGBT family members, friends, and neighbors, believes his own propaganda. His personal life — he has a lesbian sister who is raising two children with a committed partner – reflects the same cognitive dissonance conveyed in his advertisements. Despite the fact that he works tirelessly to make sure his sister and her partner remain legal strangers, he insisted to Eckholm that his anti-equality crusade is not motivated by animus. “It’s hurtful to know that many people think I dislike gays and lesbians and wish them harm,” Schubert said.
Thus far, Schubert’s crusade has been spectacularly successful. Brian Brown, whose National Organization for Marriage keeps Schubert on retainer, praised him as “the best in the business.” And the business is a lucrative one indeed — the NYT reports that Schubert is making between $10,000 and $20,000 a month from each of the anti-equality campaigns he’s running this year (in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, and Washington State), as well as a commission on every one of his radio and TV ads.
For the complete picture, head over to the New York Times‘ website and read Eckholm’s important article in full. The only thing missing is a discussion about how Schubert manages to sleep at night, knowing that his work is actively harming millions of families like mine, year after year, all across the country.










Wait a minute. No one has a right to redefine marriage? First thing: gay people aren’t seeking to redefine anything. We are seeking to participate legally in a GOVERNMENT recognized union of two people. Individuals or churches or religions don’t have to recognize anything. Second: Seems to me that if the voters of this country DID want to redefine marriage, THEY have the legal right to make it just about anything they want to make it. The general public is really a pretty stupid and gullible bunch when creeps like this bozo can guide their reasoning. Of course, it’s been happening since man developed a thinking brain. Some people think; others just react. Unfortunately for us, more people react rather than think. That’s what makes clowns like him so dangerous.
Schubert epitomizes what Upton Sinclair was saying when he penned:
““It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it.”
This ba$tard know$ full well what he is doing. Lying and maligning people who’ve done him no harm i$ fully ju$tifiable to hi$ narci$$i$tic little mind.
I wonder if his sister still has any relationship with him.
This guy is a sociopath. Well-paid by other sociopaths.
#@$#^%#!
Can someone confirm if I would be correct to assume that Schubert is a religious nut?
Oh, never mind. I just confirmed my assumption as soon as I clicked on the “profile” link in John’s post.
Can’t he and his group be sued for slander/libel when they use verifiable LIES about LGBT people? Too bad we don’t have anti-hate speech laws here like Canada does, which is light years ahead of us in so many ways.
Great ad! Shows one of the dangers of SSM. All you have to do is look at Canada and MASS and see the lawsuits, discrimination and hate piled on those who believe marriage is between a man and woman. What tolerance! Tolerance used to mean respect for someone else’s opinion. SSM advocates have transformed it to mean, ‘you have to agree with me or else.’
Right Dave. Gays are assaulted and murdered by anti-gay bigots while in the meantime across all of Canada and Massachusetts one parent claims he was arrested for being anti-gay when in reality he was arrested for refusing to leave school property when asked. And you say we’re the haters and intolerant ones. There’s widespread dangers all right, and its entirely your side endangering the lives and well being of gays.
Dave, even if that were true, you’re only telling half the story to try to prove your point. We are tolerant. You and everyone else can believe anything your little heart desires.
It is not now, nor has it even been about belief.
It’s about what you choose to do with your belief.
You believe marriage is between a man and a woman? Bravo for you! Go for it!
But it’s when you try to force your belief on others that there is a tolerance issue to be made…
I have no right to legislate your love, and you have no right to legislate mine.
Why do they always make it about being intolerant to “differing beliefs” and never about what it’s really about…
Enforcing those beliefs on me, even though it has absolutely NO relevance to their lives.
Schubert is the Adolf Eichmann of the marriage battles. Eichmann had Jewish friends, a Jewish mistress, and similarly claimed to have “no ill will toward the Jews.” Likewise, Schubert does not comprehend his complicity in the hurt caused to innocent couples, their families and children, and the years of work it will take to undo the damage he has caused. I would love to see a Nuremburg trial in Frank’s future, and would love to see Brian Brown, Tony Perkins and the other black shirts in the cage right along with him.
[...] vintage Frank Schubert form, Minnesota for Marriage — the paradoxically-named group that’s working hard to [...]