Comments on: Exodus Exec Supports Gay Ban and Political Exploitation of Marriage http://www.truthwinsout.org/blog/exodus-exec-supports-gay-ban-and-political-exploitation-of-marriage/ TruthWinsOut.org is a non-profit organization that counters right wing propaganda, exposes the “ex-gay” myth and educates America about gay life. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:54:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Scott http://www.truthwinsout.org/blog/exodus-exec-supports-gay-ban-and-political-exploitation-of-marriage/#comment-6447 Scott Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:18:57 +0000 http://www.truthwinsout.org/?p=682#comment-6447 "Are we really supposed to believe he’s solely motivated by “bad public policy?”" Of course not. $$$$$$$$ THAT, and tons of comfort food. “Are we really supposed to believe he’s solely motivated by “bad public policy?””

Of course not.

$$$$$$$$

THAT, and tons of comfort food.

]]> By: Emproph http://www.truthwinsout.org/blog/exodus-exec-supports-gay-ban-and-political-exploitation-of-marriage/#comment-6404 Emproph Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:18:02 +0000 http://www.truthwinsout.org/?p=682#comment-6404 From his <a href="http://randythomas.org/2008/05/15/gay-marriage-in-california/" rel="nofollow">original musings on the matter</a> (May 15th 2008). Randy Thomas of Exodus International: <blockquote><i>So, back to the context of today’s decision. It is not surprising that this is how the court case turned out. <b>While I do not agree with them and will do what I can to help counter efforts (if asked or in other venues.) I have no ill will toward those claiming victory tonight. I oppose bad public policy</b> for public policy and spiritual reasons and have not and will not take it personally or make it into a personal attack.</i></blockquote> Are we really supposed to believe he’s solely motivated by “bad public policy?” From his original musings on the matter (May 15th 2008).

Randy Thomas of Exodus International:

So, back to the context of today’s decision. It is not surprising that this is how the court case turned out. While I do not agree with them and will do what I can to help counter efforts (if asked or in other venues.) I have no ill will toward those claiming victory tonight. I oppose bad public policy for public policy and spiritual reasons and have not and will not take it personally or make it into a personal attack.

Are we really supposed to believe he’s solely motivated by “bad public policy?”

]]>