<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Federal Marriage Trial In California Set To Begin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truthwinsout.org/news/2010/01/5971/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truthwinsout.org/news/2010/01/5971/</link>
	<description>Fighting antigay lies and the ex-gay myth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.truthwinsout.org/news/2010/01/5971/comment-page-1/#comment-16219</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthwinsout.org/?p=5971#comment-16219</guid>
		<description>Putting aside the reasons you&#039;ve mentioned that make the procreation excuse for marriage discrimination a farce there is another reason why its invalid.  If they want to make the point that marriage is all about children, 30% of gay couples have children and its extremely hypocritical to then use that as an excuse to deny those children the benefits and protection of legally recognized parents.  Unless they&#039;re trying to make the argument that only the married procreation act  matters and children themselves are irrelevant the idea that marriage is about children necessarily entails allowing gay couples to marry for the sake of their children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting aside the reasons you&#8217;ve mentioned that make the procreation excuse for marriage discrimination a farce there is another reason why its invalid.  If they want to make the point that marriage is all about children, 30% of gay couples have children and its extremely hypocritical to then use that as an excuse to deny those children the benefits and protection of legally recognized parents.  Unless they&#8217;re trying to make the argument that only the married procreation act  matters and children themselves are irrelevant the idea that marriage is about children necessarily entails allowing gay couples to marry for the sake of their children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Hurst</title>
		<link>http://www.truthwinsout.org/news/2010/01/5971/comment-page-1/#comment-16217</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truthwinsout.org/?p=5971#comment-16217</guid>
		<description>BIG UPDATE:

Supreme Court issued an injunction against the taping of the trial.

In common parlance, this is known as &quot;bullshit.&quot;

It expires Wednesday, which will give the Court time to mull it over and make their final decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIG UPDATE:</p>
<p>Supreme Court issued an injunction against the taping of the trial.</p>
<p>In common parlance, this is known as &#8220;bullshit.&#8221;</p>
<p>It expires Wednesday, which will give the Court time to mull it over and make their final decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

