The 1998 motion picture Dark City (Amazon Instant Video) tells the tale of a city that seems trapped in eternal night. Its dreary inhabitants are troubled by an apparent loss of identity and disconnection from reality.
Dark City protagonist John Murdoch notices something is wrong with the reality around him
Their memories are incomplete, fundamental aspects of their lives don’t add up, and sinister influences are passing unacknowledged. A form of mass schizophrenia takes hold, as the residents are made to assume different identities at the collective will of someone else.
Film critic Roger Ebert ranks Dark City among his all-time favorite movies (as do I).
Dark City captures the psychology of a closed society whose residents are cut off not only from external influences, but also from their own individual souls. The inhabitants of Dark City are steered by the collective mind of an exploitive higher society. That collective dictates individuals’ identities, their selective memories, their altered histories, and their choice of friends and neighbors.
Many Dark Citians accept the communal illusion; some die trying to escape it; and one ordinary man (pictured) summons almost-magical powers in the hope of shattering the facade and facing whatever true reality might bring.
I am reminded of the Dark City universe when I step back from day-to-day news stories and examine the broad face of today’s Religious Right.
From its spell-casting, demon-invoking magicians C. Peter Wagner and the disgraced Jimmy Swaggart; to its law-givers Bryan Fischer, Mat Staver, and Pat Robertson; to its enforcers in the Family Research Council and the Republican Party, the Religious Right surrounds millions of people with a false reality — and polices the inhabitants of that reality for compliance. It dictates the identities that followers shall assume, steers their families and neighbors, and redefines inhabitants’ perceptions of reality. Today’s hero is tomorrow’s villain — who was always a villain and never anything more than that.
Within that alternate universe, people believe falsehoods and self-contradictions about the history of the Earth, human history, their own biology, and the nature of the God that they claim (sometimes with a bit too much piety) to worship.
Dark City protagonist summons mental powers
The self-contradictions of Religious Right belief are inescapable, and they have troubled followers throughout history with fundamental questions:
- How can an omnipotent and just God morally stand by while his most devout “Biblical” representatives exploit followers, corrupt the church, commit genocide, and destroy creation? What just or loving God would make innocent people in the 21st century suffer horribly and die for the sin of one man thousands of years ago?
- The Bible obviously cannot be inerrantly and morally true when it so relentlessly contradicts itself and known history — nor when it defends slavery and incest, or commands people to slaughter religious minorities.
The inhabitants of this religious community are reminded every day of this false reality, as their inspired political actions fail to achieve meaningful progress: their families become poorer and their communities sicker — not holier. They are reminded every time that they are caught cherishing contradictory community values. And they are reminded every time a denomination’s collective prayer for victory or the blood of enemies — along with literally billions of dollars in religious and political donations — results in absolute silence from God.
Religious rightist laypersons tend to limit exposure to those outside the closed community; profess “individualism” while criticizing actual independent thinking and instead practicing communal conformity; and practice a very superficial form of Christianity which they mistakenly believe is deeper and more devout than that of their neighbors.
In times of crisis, those who are most errant, or most desperate, may — like the protagonist in Dark City and many lesser movies — resort to the equivalent of magic-spells, which for Christian audiences are rebranded as “prophecy” or “prayer power.” (Disclosure: I participated in Catholic charismatic communities as a child in the early 1970s and again in the early 1980s.) Whereas the Bible commands the faithful to pray in private, faith-healers like Lou Engle, Cindy Jacobs, and Caleb Lee Brundidge (from the Uganda kill-the-gays launch conference) blasphemously boast to stadium crowds of their divine powers to smite hated sinful neighbors, ward off phantom terrorist attacks, exorcise demons from the unpossessed, and raise the undead.
Lou Engle
Cindy Jacobs
Caleb Lee Brundidge with Richard Cohen
But this is reality, folks — not an underrated arthouse film. The closed society of the U.S. Religious Right is sick, but there’s no hero coming to their rescue — indeed, critics observe, today’s Religious Right would crucify Jesus if he returned.
No volume of shouted prayers or spells will make the real world conform to the Religious Right’s collective fantasy — or shatter the secular fantasy to reveal a real world of material demons, liberty-loving “moochers,” homosexuals who eat children, abortion-loving trade unions, Jews who drink Christian blood, or black “Muslim” presidents.
The outcome of the 2012 U.S. election presents real-worlders of all faiths — and atheists — with a renewed opportunity to confront the inhabitants of the Religious Right with a mirror to show them their irrational state: their unholy media, their un-Christian lifestyles, their defamatory gossip, the unresolved personal “demons” that they project onto others, and the road that they are following toward violence.
But that confrontation may be less likely to happen if righteous secularists and pragmatists “unfriend” anyone who cowers in a Religious Right fantasy world.
What are you doing to draw people out of the Religious Right fantasy? Do you know people who have recently begun to emerge from that unreality?
Please share your thoughts with us.









Brilliant article. Love the word “realworlder.” Thanks.
In dialog with religious people, I have found that every single individual distances himself from religious extremes as ‘on the wrong track,’ or ‘getting religion wrong.’ But religious ideas simply can’t be challenged because they are parked way, way beyond any objective principles: God, revelation, passages in a book, afterlife.
Religion simply has no guard rails and ranges seamlessly to a very deep end. Faith that opposes observable data is a virtue in religion, unlike any other field of study under the sun. Any idea endures objective scrutiny except a religious one.
Each individual has to find his way off that spectrum of fantasy, and no coaxing will aid them until he himself is ready to face the uncertainties of a non-religious existence, when he’s had enough of religion’s spectrum of fantasy.
I’m modifying my above reply which upon reflection seems somewhat dismissive of fundamentalist individuals and the possibility of them becoming more informed.
I asked a wise friend how to deal with Christian fundamentalists. He replied, “Take them out, one by one.”
He meant that a thoughtful secularist considers that to many fundamentalists science is utterly foreign and that faith not only offers security, but a daily community and identity.
A secularist’s knee jerk reaction may be to react with exasperation, upset, dismissiveness or departure when a clear response would plant the seeds of learning in a fundamentalist.
Secular folk have at their disposal two tremendous resources: gentle questioning and scientific evidence.
Let’s never weary of kindly, creatively and persistently steering differences into exploring fundamentalist assumptions and showing how the common ground of observable evidence is our only common ground.
One never changes a person’s mind instantly. That mind only changes after secret rumination, perhaps over decades.
Only slowly have any of us outgrown the grave sites of our settled opinions or beliefs.
Also, ‘Dark City’ is in my top ten movies. I experienced it as a metaphor for discarding the identity assigned to one by both society and one’s own past. Your fascinating insights make me love the movie more.
I was surprised by all the republicans who actually believed that Romney was going to win (and by a landslide). Of course they got all this nonsense from Fox ‘news’ and it seemed like even the folks at Fox were stunned. I assumed that they knew that they were just feeding their watchers a load of horseshit to make them feel better, but I guess they really do live in a bubble world. One which we were happy to stick a pin in on Nov 6th.
I myself personally have been coming out of that unreality. I’d been raised for 6 years in a tiny christian private school out of the US for my high school years. Pretty much every monday was fire-and-brimstone assemblies, every holiday (including christmas) is evil, the “library” was a cabinet of encyclopedia’s, the Left Behind series and Chickt Tracks. Though, there was a bit of dissonance I noted, that felt a bit wrong, even with the brainwashing. It took meeting my bf and for him to start challenging my thoughts to start getting me to come out of the closet, and eventually, moving back to the US and reading on the horrid and ugly acts constantly being perpetrated in the name of God.
I still do consider myself Christian though, but I refuse to be a part of any organized sect of it, and try to believe in my own individual interpretation, for myself, and to shove on no one. I believe I only want to be the best person I can be, and try to emphasize the actual Jesus parts, kindness and tolerance and charity. It still is hard though, reading about every sordid act of the likes of NOM and the rest every day.
Also love the movie!
ugh. Staying as far away from it as possible; decades later I’m still recovering from my own escape.
Realistically, though, I don’t know what there is I CAN do. Leaving an all-encompassing mindset like fundamentalism is not something that is mediated through logical exchanges. A shift like that requires an extreme level of cognitive dissonance. For me it was dealing with the reality of my orientation. Once I began wrestling with the contradictions between what I was taught I was supposed to feel and what I actually felt the whole thing became to come down (yeah, it’s cliche time) like a house of cards. Had I been heterosexual I might never have left the born-again fold (and probably voted for Romney).
I look back on it as one of the most difficult and personally challenging transitions of my entire life. I suppose I would want to be supportive of someone else making that kind of paradigm shift, I suppose I could offer insights about it from my experience. But drawing someone out? Proselytizing? May as well shoo away a tornado with a flyswatter…
ahem, typo… “began to come down…”
forgot also to say that the extreme cognitive dissonance may not be enough in and of itself. I think there also needs to be some highly motivated personal investment in the shift – otherwise why would someone voluntarily undergo a radical redefining of their entire existence in the world? When I left fundamentalism I had to completely re-invent myself.
WOW I have never seen this movie. I don’t know how I missed it, since I am a fan of dark, horror, film noir, etc. In fact for the last couple of months I have been wallowing in 1960s episodes of Dark Shadows. I found myself wishing there was a Parallel Time to escape to, but then again it might not be any kind of improvement. I can hardly wait to see Dark City. Has anyone seen “Mirrors” from 2008 (I think)? Another dark flick I missed. I gotta get out more. BUUURRP excuse me.