tp Thanks, Tony Perkins, But We Didnt Ask Your Opinion On The Boston AttacksTony Perkins, being predictably awful about Boston, Newtown and the Second Amendment:

In the aftermath of horrible tragedies like Newtown, the government desperately wants to do something–even if that something is the wrong thing. There seems to be this notion, at least among liberals, that more laws will protect us–but as we all witnessed in Boston, that isn’t necessarily the case. The government can’t make us safer until it recognizes that the problem isn’t the instruments of violence–but the environment of it. Stronger background checks wouldn’t have prevented the deaths of three people at the finish line on Monday, any more than it would have stopped Floyd Corkins from walking into our lobby and shooting Leo Johnson.

If Congress wants to stop these tragedies, then it has to address the government’s own hostility to the institution of the family and organizations that can address the real problem: the human heart. As I’ve said before, America doesn’t need gun control, it needs self-control. And a Congress that actively discourages it–through abortion, family breakdown, sexual liberalism, or religious hostility–is only compounding the problem.

Yeah, I don’t think it had anything to do with abortion, the family or sexual liberalism. Whether it has anything to do with religious hostility really remains to be seen, but if so, I doubt it’s the kind that will allow you to easily play victim.

But again,  no one asked.

[h/t Right Wing Watch]