ABC: http://is.gd/W797CA
The Advocate: http://is.gd/48k6JM
CNN: http://is.gd/ZWcPnX
FOX: : http://is.gd/sg0auQ
Guardian: : http://is.gd/TrfvVp
Huffington Post: http://is.gd/NHLlBs
Minneapolis Star Tribune: http://is.gd/ZtBCLZ
New York Daily News: http://is.gd/10kBS1
PC World: http://is.gd/tIRHcz
Salon.com: http://is.gd/PY4pS8
Sydney Morning Herald: http://is.gd/Cng5bm
Toronto Star: http://is.gd/jyntkt
WKRG-TV Mobile/Pensacola: http://is.gd/ZE6DDw/
WSJ: http://is.gd/EthtvU/







I find it interesting that the paper from Canada has the most informative article.
I am completely opposed to the pray away the gay app but it’s time to put “…gate” to rest, it’s been way overdone.
If you start a movement against “-gate,” can we please call it “GateGate?”
“-gate” is so 1973.
“-istan” at least brings us into the current century.
“-ushima” would make the scandal current.
And “-xuality” would improve ranking in Christian Right media.
Which is best — iPhoneistan, the iPhonushima crisis, or the iPhonexual lifestyle?
OK, I prefer gate.
iPhoneistan-gate.