(Weekly Column)
For decades, John Smid had been the leader of Love in Action, the infamous “ex-gay” ministry that took away the underwear of clients if the undergarments appeared too gay. The strict Memphis-based ministry also used an egg timer in the bathroom to make sure its clients would not masturbate while showering.
Of all the “ex-gay” ministries this was the most cult-like – with Smid keeping tight control over the social lives of his clients, who paid a pretty penny to live in the residential program.
The amount of mind control employed by Smid to turn gay people into heterosexuals was stunning. In a 1997 interview with the Memphis Flyer, Smid, spoke of his own special technique for denying reality: “I’m looking at that wall and suddenly I say it’s blue,” Smid said, pointing to a yellow wall. “Someone else comes along and says, ‘No, it’s gold.’ But I want to believe that wall is blue. Then God comes along and He says, ‘You’re right, John, [that yellow wall] is blue.’ That’s the help I need. God can help me make that [yellow] wall blue.”
This high level of brainwashing was not uncommon for Love in Action’s star clients. For example, Anne Paulk, co-author of Love Won Out, wrote about the mind games she played to allegedly overcome her lesbian thoughts: “…I would start to experience a sexual response…So I’d look out the car window and say something like, ‘Gosh, lord, there’ a tree out there! That tree is green, and it has leaves on it. It’s got brown bark.’ I would fix my mind on anything and everything to distract myself…over time that process made me mentally disciplined enough to displace all lesbian thoughts, period.” (I photographed her “ex-gay” poster boy husband John in a gay bar)
Of course, such techniques can temporarily instill discipline to change sexual behavior – but not one’s sexual orientation. In a stunning admission this week, Smid said that altering one’s attractions are highly improbable – indeed so unlikely that he claims that he has not met a single man who truly prayed away the gay. According to Smid:
Yes, there are homosexuals that make dramatic changes in their lives as they walk through the transformation process with Jesus. I have heard story after story of changes that have occurred as men and women find the grace of God in their lives as homosexual people. But, I’m sorry, this transformation process may not meet the expectations of many Christians. I also want to reiterate here that the transformation for the vast majority of homosexuals will not include a change of sexual orientation. Actually I’ve never met a man who experienced a change from homosexual to heterosexual.
Wow. If the “ex-gay” myth did not work for Smid, then it won’t work for anyone. After all, he had incredible dedication, adhered to a hardcore form of fundamentalism, and enforced a strict cult-like regimen on his charges. Yet, years later, he is faced with the daunting reality that “ex-gay” programs are a Religious Right marketing program, not a legitimate movement.
Needless to say, leaving the past completely behind is not easy. Smid is still married to his wife and on a journey to discover his inner-truth. He has one foot in the reality-based community and one foot in a fantasy world. But the first step in leaving the “ex-gay” charade behind is admitting that the programs do not work.
It is never easy for one to acknowledge being wrong, especially after decades of investing mentally, spiritually and financially in a big lie. I wish Smid the best of luck on his continued evolution and am grateful that he is beginning to honestly discuss the limitations of “ex-gay” programs.
Smid’s timing is exquisite because desperate GOP presidential candidates are pandering to the Religious Right by touting the “ex-gay” myth. For example, on ABC’s The View Herman Cain said that he thought homosexuality was a “choice.” The ever-gay-bashing Rick Santorum also jumped on the “ex-gay” bandwagon falsely claiming there is credible evidence that say LGBT people can change from gay to straight: “There are all sorts of studies out there that suggest just the contrary,” Santorum stated. “And there are people who were gay, and lived the gay lifestyle, and aren’t anymore.”
Additionally, there are junk science peddlers such as Regent University’s Mark Yarhouse who produces bogus studies that claim that sexual orientation change is possible. I strongly suggest these crass political operatives stop the propaganda long enough to listen to Smid.
But, of course, that would require putting peoples’ lives ahead of political lies – so don’t expect this to happen anytime soon.










Truth will win out but I hope the damage done is not too great fighting these blatant lies.
I think its time for refunding all the moneys that were paid for erroneous, fraudulent, therapy. Its time for truth to meet honesty. in addition to the many wrongful death suits that now can be filed against this organization. forcing shame and despair on innocent people. Some taking their lives because they felt they could not be whole or acceptable unless they were heterosexual.. Shame shame shame shame..This is what happen when man thinks he knows god. he imposes his self image of god on everyone else. and love is replaced by law. His law not gods law. Dark Ages indeed.
I think it’s an astounding admission. One Smid did not have to make. I’m honored that he chose to tell the world the truth. I have a little more hope [for humanity] than I did before his admission. It’s certainly a step in the right direction.
No need for baby steps when the whole program was fraudulent to begin with. Honesty deserves a full voice shouted from the mountain tops; not tid bits of truth to shield the lies.
Let’s face it, it should be a simple trivial task for God to change a person’s sexual orientation. But, if He exists, He apparently doesn’t want to.
As far as I know, the only ex-gays who claim to have altered their sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual are a handful of men and women who run one or another ex-gay program. For example, Richard Cohen, Joe Dallas, and Anthony Falzorano all claim to have converted to satisfied, fully functioning heterosexuals decades ago.
Wayne, I’d be curious to hear your thoughts about this. Are you aware of any ex-gay who is claiming to have converted and who is not a leader of an ex-gay org? And do you think these ex-gay leaders are bona fide gay-to-straight converts?
Every fully “converted” person I have witnessed for more than a decade is “ex-gay” for pay.
I think some were never gaym at all. I’ve partially read two books written by Joe Dallas, before throwing them in the trash. He is bisexual, if anything. He was with men and enjoyed men, but he also caroused with women, as well. He didn’t change anything except where he focused his libido.
Same with Janet Boynes. She is a bisexual posing as an ex-lesbian. She seems all about peddling her book.
Talk about gay for pay. you are the one Mr Besen who is gay for pay. Most of us (leaders) in the EX-GAY movement are paid next to nothing for the work we do. Folks don’t be fooled by Wayne Besen, he gets his jollies off by trying to destroy the ex-gay movement. The truth is that there are tens of thousands of ex-gays who have come out of the gay lifestyle and go on to have a normal life. Noone I repeat noone in the ex-gay movement is financially rich. We do our work and combat the lies about the gay lifestyle because we care about the homosexual person, his soul and where he will spend eternity.
Oh Anthony, sounds to me like you’re perpetuating lies about the gay “lifestyle” and you don’t care about the “homosexual person” or you wouldn’t try to capitalize on their self-hatred by trying to turning them into a loveless, sexless being. So you’re a leader in the ex-gay movement? Are you still homosexual or do you claim to be heterosexual?
Anthony… Wayne doesn’t need help to destroy the ex-gay movement. The movement is imploding very well on its own.
I noticed you had nothing to say about John Smid’s confession. That’s pretty telling. You can’t exactly write him off as someone who wasn’t committed to the movement.
So, I guess you’ll just ignore him and pretend he didn’t say anything?
Come on Anthony, what do you think of John Smid’s admission? Inquiring minds want to know. Don’t worry, no one here will try to dissuade you from your lifestyle choice. As Upton Sinclair once wrote:
“It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it.”
After all, if you gave up the ex-gay, you might have to go out and earn a real living like the rest of us do!
Anthony Falzarano, you accuse Wayne of trying to destroy the “ex-gay” movement. I think that your accusation is absolutely justified. More power to his elbow, I say: the sooner the sun sets on this pernicious hocus-pocus, the better. But that can’t nullify the force of John Smid’s momentous admission, for which Wayne can hardly claim any credit, and about which you apparently have nothing to say.
If there are “tens of thousands of ex-gays who have come out of the gay lifestyle”, why has there not been a “Ten-Thousand Man (and Woman) Ex-Gay March”?
So Anthony, would you let your daughter or sister marry Alan Chambers, who admits he still fights his sexual attraction to men on a daily basis? And yet Alan is the role model which we are supposed to aspire to…
P.S. I notice that Exodus and the other “ex-gay” ministries have nothing to say about this either.
[...] into “an authentic relationship with Christ,” has been hailed throughout the LGBT blogosphere are a startling and welcome change. It certainly gives new meaning to Ex0dus [...]
Are we really expected to believe that out of tens of thousands alleged “ex-gays”, not ONE has consented to a tumescence exam?
Thanks Wayne, for another great read, and for all the hard work you and TWO does! I know you are making a difference in the lives of people–keep on keeping on!
Well, the truth may be out, but not without a string of dead bodies in the wake.
Magic doesn’t exist. Or, at least, there’s never been any verifiable, repeatable, testable proof offered in the six millennia this particular ruse has been perpetrated on humans. There is no virtue in thinking anything supernatural is a viable, problem solving tool. The so-called grace of God is substituting conviction with reality and opinion with facts. Nothing in anybody’s freedom of religion compels another to behave as if one believes as do the religious, or enable their self delusion, or even pretend they have a point. Fraudulent reparative therapy causes too much damage among too many innocents to risk its deliterious effects on even a single collateral victim.
[...] Wayne Besen: John Smid’s Stunning Admission. Read more [...]
[...] that “ex-gay” programs are a Religious Right marketing program, not a legitimate movement. http://www.truthwinsout.org/pressreleases/2011/10/19306/ Share this:TwitterStumbleUponEmailFacebookLike this:LikeOne blogger likes this post. Leave [...]
@Anthony Falzorano:
I hope that you will respond to some of the comments here. It would be much more constructive and consistent with your ministry’s objectives.
If you would be kind enough to consider them, my 3 questions are:
- How do you know that the number of ex-gays is in the tens of thousands (as opposed to dozens, scores, hundreds, etc.)? In other words, how did you arrive at that conclusion when, to my knowledge, there has never been an attempt to number them?
- What do you mean when you say that these people “came out of the gay lifestyle and go on to have a normal life”? Do you mean that these people lose their same-sex attraction, become attracted to the opposite sex, and go on to have satisfying heterosexual relations? Or do you mean celibacy? Or do you mean a situation like Mr. Smid describes, wherein he continues to be same-sex attracted but nevertheless lives his life in a traditional marriage? Please clarify.
- Last question: If your goal is to help gays to become ex-gay, why do you engage in divisive politics on “gay rights”? Being an ex-gay Christian does not mean that you have to become an anti-gay activist. I saw that you came flew all the way to NY to oppose gay marriage. How did that help anyone to become ex-gay? On the contrary, if a gay person were considering coming to you to explore the ex-gay path, your involvement in strident anti-gay politics would act as a deterrent.
David…
Patritsm may be the the last refuge of a scoundrel, but logic,fact, and compassion are the last refuge of a militant homosexua activist.
[...] Full Article HERE! [...]
To Anthony up there, I’m pretty sure those people were living a very normal like for themselves until you decided to define for them what normal is.
Also, if your god truly hates gays, and gays are still here, then he is not all powerful, or is getting rapidly sick of people like you telling other people his opinions.
[...] ex-gay leader John Smid recently acknowledged that, in his decades of ministry to make thousands of gay men turn straight, none had truly changed [...]
[...] via Truth Wins Out – John Smid’s Stunning Admission. [...]
I have been openly in a mixed orientation marriage for 25 years, and my wife and I, and my son, are quite open and undertand our reasons for staying together. It must be realized that millions of gays made the decision, 30 – 50 years ago — another time, to be sure — to marry and have children, when there was little option for the average person. Those people are perhaps the iceberg below the 10% of LGBTs that is visible, that homosexuals are far more common than many believe. Those people, caught up in mixed – orientation marriages, some openly, and some not, need respect and support from the rest of the community, as it is so difficult to come out at this time.
@ A. Falzarano
There are no legitimate claims that can be made that so many gay people converted unconditionally and without coercion, when the conditions under which such claims are made are in fact abusive and coercive.
During Jim Crow, a light skinned black, or a Jew or others whose lives and livelihoods could be threatened might understandably PASS for being a white person or non Jew.
Jim Crow or any other discriminatory system like it is brutal and denies even the very humanity of those FORCED to live under such standards.
So a person passing to escape such conditions has good reason to.
Those who have NO good reason for being, are those who support those conditions, and pretend that such conversion makes life easier and less burdensome.
I wouldn’t think much of those passing for something they are not, to support Jim Crow or other laws that kept their brethren in a state of inferior status and violation of their human rights. They are in effect, throwing those who cannot or will not pass, to the wolves making all the rules.
Ex gays show their weakness of character in doing so. And when political candidates encourage people to keep gay people in such a status and use the possibility of conversion to do it, that is an indicator of just how desperate and despicable you’re willing to be to pander to those in power.
Uriah Heep comes to mind.
I’m an ever hetero Mr.F and one’s sexual orientation is NOT AN ACCOMPLISHMENT.
It matters what we DO with our sexuality, to be sure.
But using your passing as an accomplishment means nothing.
A gay person however, who is open and honest and succeeds in life, DESPITE all the factions attacking every freedom they deserve, SHOULD be applauded.
THAT is an accomplishment to be sure.
Just as I’d applaud a darker skinned black person who succeeded in something despite Jim Crow.
I’m a black woman, with family and personal experience about being treated like a stupid child, regardless of MY accomplishments. Especially by men, just throwing their male entitlement around, despite doing less with their lives than I have.
I can’t stand seeing how gay men and women are treated. Especially by the phony compassion that the ex gay industry has been peddling.
It’s condescending and without the efficacy or positive effectiveness to justify existing.
If your first mission were to eliminate the Jim Crow status of gay people, and THEN see if anyone gay thinks that living hetero is the ‘better way’, then you might have a point regarding your motives.
But that’s not what happens. That’s not how ex gays generally behave.
Ex gays foment EVERY stereotype and prejudice the anti gay already have and use to exclude gay people even from the Constitution.
And you want respect and applause for THAT?!
How. Revolting.
Anthony! We are still awaiting a response to our questions! What’s the matter? Cat got your tongue?