(Weekly Column)
Hillary Clinton’s soaring speech on international LGBT issues was game changing. An historic address of this magnitude was desperately needed to counter the rising tide of backwards and barbaric nations that had recently been persecuting LGBT people to distract from their glaring problems.
“I want to talk about the work we have left to do to protect one group of people whose human rights are still denied in too many parts of the world today,” said Clinton to a packed auditorium of human rights activists who gathered in Geneva for International Human Rights Day. “I am talking about gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people, human beings born free and given bestowed equality and dignity, who have a right to claim that, which is now one of the remaining human rights challenges of our time.”
The list of countries that recently declared war on sexual minorities include: Russia, Nigeria, Cameroon, Uganda, Iran, and Zimbabwe. For the contemptible despots who run these underachieving nations, fomenting homophobia makes political sense. By turning homosexuals into bogeymen these rulers can conceal their corruption and appear moral through the blessings of craven clergy.
If the worldwide attacks on LGBT people seem deliberate and coordinated, it is because they very well may be. In author Jeff Sharlet’s book, The Family, he reveals that ambitious American evangelicals are working to surround The United States, Canada, and Western Europe with fundamentalist regimes – using homosexuality as a key wedge issue to gain power. Researchers Rachel Tabachnick and Bruce Wilson have also documented that a radical and sprawling evangelical group, The New Apostolic Reformation, has infiltrated many countries and exported anti-LGBT hate.
It has been greatly disturbing to witness the war on LGBT people unfolding in recent weeks. I had privately fretted that these AHEM’s (American Hate Exporting Movements) were further along in their dubious and dangerous designs than people realized. I was also concerned that the American government would back off challenging international homophobia in an election year. After all, the Obama administration surely did not want to be browbeaten as anti-faith by phony martyrs and their false claims of religious discrimination.
However, something drastic needed to happen to turn back the tide of violence and discrimination that plagued these “loser nations.” The U.S. had to make it crystal clear that those exporting hate were not representing our government. Instead, these zealots were operating a shadow foreign policy that undermined America’s interests.
President Barack Obama boldly stepped into this bloody vacuum and provided desperately needed leadership and moral clarity. He issued an incredible memorandum directing all agencies to “promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons.” This was followed by Clinton’s moving speech that was as notable for its directness, as it was for its depth.
Usually in such addresses we get diplomatic drivel that satisfies no one and accomplishes little. But today’s actions by the administration and Clinton’s speech were different. The words were spoken with true vision and encrusted in values. There was clarity and passion, and no one was left wondering where our country stood on the rights of LGBT people.
This was one of those times where our nation demonstrated true international leadership and made me incredibly proud to be an American. It was stirring to witness our country act decisively as force for moral good. There was no patronizing that relegated the LGBT community to the role of liberalism’s unwanted stepchild. There were no carefully crafted and focus grouped code words that sugarcoated the abuses – just the honest truth spoken from the heart.
“It is a violation of human rights when people are beaten or killed because of their sexual orientation, or because they do not conform to cultural norms about how men and women should look or behave,” said Clinton in her speech. “It is a violation of human rights when governments declare it illegal to be gay, or allow those who harm gay people to go unpunished.”
The beauty of Clinton’s talk was that it was highly educational. It forcefully challenged the ignorant stereotypes and vicious lies disseminated by despots and their American evangelical patrons.
“Being gay is not a Western invention; it is a human reality,” Clinton said. “And protecting the human rights of all people, gay or straight, is not something that only Western governments do.”
Needless to say, the leaders of AHEM’s and anti-LGBT politicians went nuts. “This is just the most recent example of an administration at war with people of faith in this country,” said failing presidential candidate Rick Perry, who shocked people by putting a complete sentence together. Perry conveniently failed to mention that Clinton and Obama are both people of deep faith.
The stunning events in Geneva mark the moment Barack Obama secured a national LGBT vote for his 2012 re-election campaign. Today we felt hope – but more importantly, we witnessed monumental change.










[...] Hillary Clinton’s Historic LGBT Speech Provides Hope and Change. Read more [...]
It was a great speech. IMO, the US can and should take action to prevent US citizens from aiding and abetting human rights abuses against gay people abroad. As Clinton said, people have the right of free speech, so you can’t prohibit an American from going abroad and making anti-gay speeches. But we can prohibit them from taking actions which aid in unlawful conduct. For example, an American sending money to individuals or organizations who abuse human rights should be criminally liable. An American who writes to the Ugandan parliament to provide specific drafting advice on a bill that would send to prison gay people and those advocating on behalf of gay people arguably could be prosecuted. The latter example is real and it would cut a closer First Amendment question. But it is certainly an issue that the US government could push if it is serious.
Laudable and long overdue, but a bit rich coming from a government official who represents a country which bans same-sex couples from marrying in 31 states and allows ballot initiatives to overturn court or legislative orders to legalize it, plus no enactment of ENDA. The U.S. needs to practice what it preaches before admonishing others around the world. We should lead by example and we’re clearly not doing it.
Robert in NYC, I suspect you’re fairly young (not that there’s anything wrong with that :)). We need to keep in mind the longer perspective. I “came out” literally in the summer of Stonewall in 1969. During the 42 years since then, the change in the U.S. for gay people has been astonishing, and the pace of change has been steadily quickening over those years. Nowadays it feels like we are seeing as much change in one year as we used to see in one decade. None of this is to say the U.S. doesn’t have a lot more work to do. But Hillary’s speech took my breath away. Right up until her speech I could not have imagined a Secretary of State devoting an entire major speech to advocating equal human rights for LGBT people worldwide, plus having it coupled with specific directives from the Obama administration.
@ Richard,
I totally agree. I posted earlier that if someone had told me 10 years ago that a US Sec. of State would be making a speech like this now, I would have laughed in their face.
Amazing.
I was in work whilst watching and actually had to surreptitiously wipe a small tear from the corner of my eye, such was the significance of this speech.
Also, I think it really serves to illustrate the astonishing contrast between the current administration and the crop of potential GOP presidential contenders.
I watched it again today and if possible, am even more inspired than yesterday, and I cried again today.
I think back to Harvey Milk, “You gotta give them Hope” President Obama, through Hillary Clinton, give me HOPE. Richard I particularly enjoyed reading your perspective.
Richard, actually, I’m not that young. I turned 61 this past July. I respect your point of view nonetheless.
I only wish President Obama would have the courage to do what Prime Minister David Cameron of the UK did recently in October 2011 by declaring support for marriage equality during the conservative party conference. Cameron also admonished nations such as Uganda, Nigeria and other offenders in much the same terms as Hilary Clinton did. The British government also warned that it will cut off direct aid to the offending governments of those nations who criminalize gay people. It didn’t get much coverage over here in our media.
Hillary’s speech was amazing YES but we must get our own house in order, regardless of the progress we have made and anyone who fails to call the OBAMA Administration out on the home based infractions at some juncture misses the chance to take this fantastic new foreign policy the extra mile … as I wrote yesterday ….”While as an activist on the issue I am deeply grateful to the President and Sec Clinton, but I cannot help but allude to a recent conversation I had with David Bahati, the member of the Ugandan parliament currently seeking to pass the Ugandan Anti-homosexuality Bill (the Kill-The -Gays -Bill.) Bahati asked me a poignant question: “surely if your country (USA) thought being gay is okay, you would have laws that protect gays and not laws that work against gays?” http://oblogdeeoblogda.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/lgbt-foreign-policy-applauded-and-human-rights-should-start-at-home-with-fiance-visas-and-greencards-for-same-sex-couples/
Sorry Melanie, but that is a load of horse s**t. Amazing how Bahati conveniently did not conclude that the U.S. doesn’t think being black is okay because we have higher incarceration rates among this demographic, as well as many insidious forms of discrimination. He basically was spinning to justify his psychotic desire to kill LGBT people.
I have little tolerance for those who try to let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
“The third, and perhaps most challenging, issue arises when people cite religious or cultural values as a reason to violate or not to protect the human rights of LGBT citizens. This is not unlike the justification offered for violent practices towards women like honor killings, widow burning, or female genital mutilation. Some people still defend those practices as part of a cultural tradition. But violence toward women isn’t cultural; it’s criminal. Likewise with slavery, what was once justified as sanctioned by God is now properly reviled as an unconscionable violation of human rights.”
Wow! You go girl! :)
Robert in NYC, with a little stretching I can still contend that you are “fairly young.” I turned 67 this past July.
Regarding Cameron’s actions – and correct me if I’m wrong – I don’t think Britain has nearly as much religion-based bigotry as we have in the US, and thus the political risks for Cameron were probably lower.
This speech reminded me why I love being a Democrat. It was a great speech in every way, and a special moment for gay rights, to see the Secretary of State give such a speech and take that position without apology.
On the Republican side, they totally missed this valuable moment. They seemingly could not understand why this was a milestone worth celebrating, a milestone that should have made decent people proud to be Americans, that our government was putting its force behind the message that no one should be discriminated against, punished or killed because of who they love. Worse, they accused the Obama administration of “promoting homosexuality” and “special rights.”
I feel sorry for people who miss the sanctity of such a moment. We have indeed come a long way. When I first got to NYC at age 17 (I’m 41 now), it was still mainstream belief that gays were interested in little boys. Thankfully, that and much of the other intolerance has been pushed to the fringes.
No need to be rude to a guest on your site Wayne – or a fellow slogger or should I say blogger- Just repeating what was said – and I have indeed mentioned it out of the original context which I will not waste time with here; save to say he said what he said and that is not “horse s**t” as you so eloquently state.
Bottom line is when it comes to LGBT rights we have to clean up at home before we can have real standing on the issue globally… and what better way to illustrate it than through the perceptions of those whom we are trying to admonish. The other topics you think Bahati should have considered were not contextually relevant.
I don’t give any shining torch to those who want to kill gays, least of all David Bahati. The point is the Obama admin is targeting Bahati ‘s pending bill – that I know – The State Department knows where it is at and the speech and memo was directed in many ways to Ugandan parliamentarians (as the many others around the globe of course.)
While we are far ahead of those who criminalize homosexuality, US LGBT are still second class citizens, especially in the eyes of binational couples – and so it would be remiss of us not to show statements of those whom we admonish to reflect back on cleaning our own house – plain and simple. David Bahati has a point and he made it – like it or not!
With regard to being rude… I probably wont be coming back to your site. I have been a great supporter for a long time and given you many links backs etc. I Don’t expect to be treated this way!
Melanie said “David Bahati has a point and he made it – like it or not!”.
No he doesn’t. Bahati’s excuse is similar to a murderer saying to someone who’s slapped another person “You have no grounds to condemn me murdering someone, you’re bad too.”
Melanie — I apologize. Cut me some slack — it’s my wedding day. :)
You and jamie are getting married?
Melanie, I don’t think there is anyone here who thinks everything is great just because of this one speech–but, I think it’s important to recognize what an important moment this is. We should be allowed to say so on the occasions our leaders do get it right.
Wayne ty for reaching out.apology accepted and mazeltov. If the others read my work at http://www.oblogdeeoblogda.wordpress.com they will see I gave full kudos to Obama and Clinton. I said the speech and memo are astoundong, I am moved and grateful. I wrote 3 artcles on my site. In the third I said we would be remiss if we did not look at the international perception, then cited what Bahati said to me nd asked Obama to repeal doma.. If anyone thinks I am considering any excuses for bahati please tell me which thumb u sucked that out of?
[...] wingnut reaction to Hillary Clinton’s historic speech on international LGBT issues has been predictably lame, so it’s no surprise that Porno Pete [...]