(Weekly Column)
I agree with Focus on the Family co-founder James Dobson when he objects to Callista Gingrich becoming the First Lady because, “she was a mistress for eight years,” and share the view of right wing blowhard Jason Molotov Mitchell when he says that, “Newt and Callista are the last role models we want our sons and daughters looking up to.”
Both Dobson and Mitchell are odious human beings who peddle hate and traffic in lies – but at least they appear to be true social conservatives. The unassailable fact is that if you support or plan to vote for Newt Gingrich you do not stand for traditional family values. Indeed, the free-loving morality of Gingrich and his wife mirrors the distorted stereotypes they often unfairly project onto hippies and liberals.
Will someone in the Republican Party please tell me how this scheming, cheating couple that made a mockery of family values is remotely conservative? They had a secretive, sleazy affair that they hid for years until they could no longer conceal it. The hanky-panky was occurring even as Gingrich boisterously and brazenly skewered President Bill Clinton over his affair with Monica Lewisnsky.
Thanks to Gingrich’s effective dressing down of CNN’s John King and his general bludgeoning of the mainstream media, reporters have been somewhat cowed and a tad reluctant to say the obvious: Callista is a shameless home wrecker and Newt is a philandering hypocrite who talks like a preacher and lives like a porn star. Here are a few inconvenient facts:
- Newt fell in love with his high school geometry teacher, Jackie, and married her. (If it had been a gay relationship or a Democrat, no doubt Gingrich would have called the relationship pedophilia)
- Jackie, Gingrich’s first wife, claims that while she was recovering from cancer surgery in 1980, Newt came to the hospital to discuss divorcing her so he could marry his mistress, Marianne.
- In 2011, Gingrich justified his affairs by claiming they were “partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country.” (Just imagine how passionate about America he will feel if elected president!)
- In 2012, his second wife, Marianne, who suffered from Multiple Sclerosis, claimed that when she found out about the affair with Callista, Newt gave her an ultimatum that she must share him in an “open marriage.” When she declined, he divorced her.
The truth is, Newt Gingrich treats women like used cars, trading them in for newer models when something goes wrong under the hood or the new car smell dissipates. He is a totally despicable person who has poor character, is ethically challenged, and displays essentially no integrity or personal responsibility – yet hoards of born-again Christians seem to love him.
“I came at it completely believing that evangelical women would not even consider him,” Penn Nance of Concerned Women for America told The New Yorker. “I’ve been surprised by their willingness to listen and forgive.”
It is time to drop all pretenses by pretending there is a pro-family movement in America. These two-faced scoundrels are not “pro-family” they are simply anti-gay. The only time these holier-than-thou charlatans give a damn about family values is when they slam democrats like John Edwards or to bash homosexuals. When Edwards cheated on his sick wife and lied about it he was ruined and reduced to a pariah. Gingrich engaged in the exact same behavior and instead of becoming a pariah he might become president.
To cover their putrid past, the couple is trying to hide behind religion with Callista claiming that “When Newt became a Catholic, it was one of the happiest moments of my life.” However, there are many of us who have been around long enough to remember Gingrich preaching and preening about his Christian values back when he was Speaker of the House. His sense of piety was so grandiose that he once declared himself the “definer of civilization.”
Which civilization, the orgies of ancient Greece?
Generally, I tend to not give a damn about the personal lives of politicians, as long as they do their jobs. But it is galling and appalling that Gingrich would wife swap and bed hop while denying me the right to marry. In a recent New Hampshire presidential debate Gingrich said he opposed marriage equality for LGBT couples and justified his discriminatory position by invoking the “sacrament” of marriage.
This self-righteous hypocrite wouldn’t know a sacrament from Sacramento.
Even more disturbing, in The New Yorker we learn that Callista’s longtime friend, Karen Olson, is a lesbian. Newt’s sister, Candace, is also a lesbian. With normal people, learning that friends and family members are gay changes their hearts and inevitably leads them to support equal rights. However, Newt and Callista seem more than willing to throw their “loved ones” under the bus to help his political aspirations.
If social conservatives do not stand up and smack down Gingrich’s candidacy, it is fair to say that there is no such thing as the Religious Right — just a bunch of self-righteous scolds who don’t know the difference between right and wrong.










I don’t think she should be called First Mistress. She was not the first. Possibly not even the second or third….
This self-righteous hypocrite wouldn’t know a sacrament from Sacramento.
And I’m a sacrament-eatin’ Queer Episcopalian IN Sacramento! Newt can kiss my queer “Better Family Values than his on my WORST day” @rse!
plz, have you read Dobson’s story about his deathmatch with his wiener dog?
No human being, social conservative or liberal, would abuse a dog like that. He’s not a human.
sorry to harp on about this, but seriously:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare_Psychopathy_Checklist
People see the word Psychopath and immediately think of the likes of Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer.
When I read the checklist, I immediately thought of Gingrich. Even some of the ways you have described him in the above article could refer directly to some of the points on Hare’s list.
The truth is that many CEO’s, politicians and business leaders fit the Psychopathy check list. Criminal psychopaths ruin people’s lives by killing or maiming a member of someones family. But this is a rather limited number of people.
Psychopaths in the worlds of business and politics have the potential to ruin many, many more people’s lives through economic and social policy, and have NO regard for the livelyhoods of those their actions affect. Just so long as they get what THEY want (to stay in power, receive their bonus, or whatever).
Newt is incredibly dangerous, and the sooner he drops out of public life, the better.
Evan, I did a Google search for the dog story, and this is what I found: http://lippard.blogspot.com/2010/09/james-dobsons-dog-beating-story.html
I certainly wouldn’t want him near any of my animals.
Of course we also have the story of Mitt Romney carrying his Irish setter in a carrier atop his car for hundreds of miles. I don’t know about some of these people.
Militant anti-gay activist Gingrich is despicable. He’s completely amoral and is not fit to lead our country. If character counts as radical conservatives kept telling us, Swingrich’s character is disgusting.
I don’t know, Evan. Considering not only the killing of the family cat, but the vandalism of its corpse (the corpse had the word ‘LIBERAL’ markered onto it) that happened in Arkansas recently, I would not put it past a certain side to stoop that low.
Mike Huckabee, former Gov. of Arkansas ran for President. And his oldest son deliberately killed a dog when the son was a Boy Scout. Huckabee, being the self righteous Christian that he is, decided his work had been done when a convicted murdered declared his conversion and piety.
Huckabee bought the act, and commuted the guy’s sentence and he was released from prison.
Only to murder again.
Some Christians think they can convert ANYTHING.
Gay to straight, manipulative sociopath murderers to reformed good citizens.
I mean seriously? What kind of screwed up priorities are these?
Who needs that kind of hypocrisy and lack of sense running the dog pound, let alone the entire country?
You may like my video about Newt’s three marriages at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQSsMRe6BJE
There are chickens in it. Everybody loves chickens!
It also ends with a splash of Santorum!
Civil marriage was, isn’t and NEVER will be a sacramment. It’s only the roman cult that considers it as such. What part of civil and religious don’t these people understand? Since when does religion own civil marriage, anywhere in the world for that matter?
“yet hoards of born-again Christians seem to love him.”
It should be “hordes.”