I’m not sure what you’d test about Downing’s honesty with a a lie detector or MRI, or ouija board or tea-leaves for that matter. As far as I read he hasn’t actually denied the bizarre nudey pants-down goings-on in his office… merely that he didn’t do it with “malicious intent”. Oh and Teh Gays are lying about him, or something.

Well, OK, Alan Downing. I can accept that. Ignorant and manipulative and unethical doesn’t equal malicious, even if they all end up causing harm to conflicted people.

What say we all just agree you did it with “sleazy intent” instead?

This will FORCE a response from Downing and his big bag of bullshit.

Seriously, Wayne. I think that’s a good point. These kids don’t really have any reason to lie about this, it serves their lives in no way to lie, so when their tests come back showing them to be truthful, doesn’t that force Downing and his ‘organization’ to respond in some way???

That was nice. But I think he should be concerned about the publicity on him. I think this is a classic example of denial by use of tactics such as diversion. It’s not about me…its about this, and that, and the poor troubled youth who will get hurt. It’s not about me. Shifting the attention from this to that was Reker’s strategy, i.e., he was lifting my luggage.

They will not sue because they do not want the world to see the nauseating and horrifying truth.

Get the ex-anti gay industry to sue, and then, as in the prop 8 trial, show in a ocurt of law that they have nothing on their side.

I beg them to sue and pray every night they will. First thing we would do is counter sue.

That would open up their records and we would finally see the full extent of the damage they have caused. We could put these charlatans and criminals on the stand and let them defend fondle therapy and therapeutic lap dances. We would dismantle their pernicious lies.

FYI: We have several more clients who would back us up in court. In essence, we’d clean their clock and likely bring down JONAH, Journey into Manhood, People Can Change, and possibly even NARTH.

So, please ex-gays — sue us.

Two people have complained. That means that there are probably exponentially more people out there who had the same things done to them. He knows that if he sued, others would come out of the woodwork saying, “But he did the same thing to me!”

Seems this would further force his hand to face the charges with their successfully completed tests, no?

I’m just saying; seems obvious tact here to route him out.

MHill