Posted November 30th, 2009 by Michael Airhart

Although her subordinate Eric Goosby seemed to defend no-strings aid to Uganda last week, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this afternoon said international efforts to criminalize homosexuality are “unacceptable.”

Hillary ClintonIt remains unclear to what extent this policy will affect U.S. foreign aid for HIV/AIDS prevention. Human Rights Watch and other critics have complained that this aid has been misused by recipient African evangelical organizations and government officials to persecute and kill gay and HIV-positive Africans, particularly in Uganda.

Clinton’s remarks came on the eve of World AIDS Day.

The Advocate quoted Clinton:

“Obviously our efforts are hampered whenever discrimination or marginalization of certain populations results in less effective outreach and treatment. So we will work not only to ensure access for all who need it but also to combat discrimination more broadly,” she said during a press conference in which the officials also announced that the XIX International AIDS Conference in 2012 will be held in United States for first time since 1990. “We have to stand against any efforts to marginalize and criminalize and penalize members of the LGBT community worldwide.”

Specifically at issue is pending legislation in Uganda that would extend the punishment for engaging in gay sex to life imprisonment and introduce the death penalty for those who do so while HIV-positive – an act termed “aggravated homosexuality” within the bill.

Mark Bromley, Chair of the Council for Global Equality, said he was pleased to see Secretary Clinton take a firm stand against antigay bigotry.

“The United States must make it absolutely clear to Uganda that the passage of the bill, which includes a death penalty provision and criminalizes those who fail to report suspected homosexuals to the authorities, would substantially impact our bilateral relationship and our health investments in that country,” he said.

As Truth Wins Out and other sites previously reported, the United States in late October pledged to provide Uganda with nearly $250 million in development assistance next year. (Read More)

Posted November 8th, 2009 by Michael Airhart

Four nations have taken preliminary action against the brewing human-rights disaster in Uganda.

As previously reported, passage is expected in January of a law requiring execution of Ugandan HIV-positive homosexuals and long prison sentences for pastors and family members who refuse to turn in someone they know to be gay. The law would also ban all speech that discusses homosexuality in a neutral or tolerant fashion, thus inhibiting health care and sound science, and it would effectively prohibit human-rights advocacy and legal defense of LGBT persons.

The penalty for homosexual orientation in Uganda is life imprisonment.

In Britain, according to PinkNews.co.uk, a spokeswoman from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office said:

We are concerned by the introduction of a private member’s bill on anti-homosexuality in Uganda.

Adoption of the bill could do serious damage to efforts to tackle HIV and its criminalisation of organisations that support homosexuality could, in theory, encompass most donor agencies and international NGOs.

The UK, alongside our EU partners, has raised our concerns about the draft bill and LGBT rights more broadly with the government of Uganda, including with the prime minister and several other ministers, the Ugandan Human Rights Commission, and senior officials from the Ugandan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

We will continue to track the passage of the bill and to lobby against its introduction.

France’s foreign ministry released a statement:

France expresses deep concern regarding the bill currently before the Ugandan parliament.

France reiterates its commitment to the decriminalisation of homosexuality and the fight against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

In the United States, four members of Congress wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warning that the legislation had severe implications for the freedom and safety of gay people and for freedom of speech and public health in Uganda.

However, In Australia, the national senate declined to condemn the death-penalty and family-imprisonment legislation. According to the Sydney Star Observer, Joe Ludwig of the Labor Party told senators it was inappropriate for the Senate to hear such a resolution.

The Government’s view is that complex matters of international relations should not be considered in the Senate by means of formal motions. It is counterproductive for motions of this kind to single out one country,” he said, before restating the Government’s opposition to laws criminalising GLBT people.

As recently as last month … the Australian ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva noted the importance of eliminating discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity.

The Star Observer notes that the death-penalty legislation “is supported by the Ugandan Muslim Supreme Council, as well as the Orthodox, Pentecostal, Seventh Day Adventist and Anglican churches in Uganda.”

Now would be an appropriate time for the Episcopal Church USA to appeal to the Anglican Communion for an emphatic condemnation of antigay violence, execution, and censorship in Uganda.

Posted November 5th, 2009 by Michael Airhart

With the help of more than $200 million annually in U.S. taxpayer funds — including millions earmarked for antigay “AIDS prevention” –Ugandan political and religious leaders have shown the world that their new idea of internationally funded AIDS prevention and care is to execute the nation’s gay people if they are HIV-positive.

That’s the objective of the nation’s new Anti-Homosexuality Bill, which escalates the despotic country’s already-draconian sentence of life imprisonment for LGBT Ugandans. As Box Turtle Bulletin has observed, the legislation would:

  • Extend the definition of prosecutable homosexuality from sexual activity to merely “touch[ing] another person with the intention of committing the act of homosexuality.”
  • Create a new category of “aggravated homosexuality” which provides for the death penalty for “repeat offenders” and for cases where the individual is HIV-positive.
  • Criminalize all speech and peaceful assembly for those who defend LGBT Ugandans with fines and imprisonment of between five and seven years.
  • Criminalize the act of obtaining a same-sex marriage abroad with lifetime imprisonment.
  • Add a clause which forces friends or family members to report LGBT persons to police within 24 hours of learning about the individual’s homosexuality or face fines or imprisonment of up to three years.
  • Add extra-territorial and extradition provisions, allowing Uganda to prosecute LGBT Ugandans living abroad.

U.S. evangelical Rick Warren, among others, refuses to condemn this situation. Political Research Associates noted last week that Rick Warren has been a steadfast supporter of Archbishop Henry Orombi and Pastor Martin Ssempa, both of whom favor vigilantism and execution of LGBT Ugandans. Warren has freely interfered in Ugandan affairs, offering tacit endorsement of his allies’ condom-burning rallies and anti-gay witch hunts.

A spokesperson for Warren told Religion Dispatches on Nov. 3 that Warren no longer supports Ssempa — but failed to retract Warren’s support for Orombi and declined to oppose the proposed legislation.

Jim Naughton, Canon for Communications and Advancement for the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, observed:

“What does it say if you’re unwilling to say that the state shouldn’t execute homosexuals?”

U.S. congressional leaders delivered  a warning letter about this brewing crisis to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, but according to Religion Dispatches, the State Department has initially declined to respond.

Meanwhile, most Ugandan media have obediently followed the murderous lead of the nation’s undemocratic rulers in advocating for the bill.

But The Monitor notes that much of the legislation violates the nation’s constitution and threatens non-gay Ugandans by suppressing speech, dividing families, obstructing medical treatment, and encouraging prosecution based upon false accusations.

Okello LucimaAnother publication, The Independent, on Nov. 4 courageously condemned the legislation while explaining the corrupt politics behind it. Okello Lucima wrote:

This is not only cavalier violations of human rights, but a dangerous hate campaign and incitement to harm or kill members of the GLBT in Uganda. The people of Uganda, and all people of good will, must not sit and watch while this happens. The sponsors of the bill, their supporters and political leaders- inside and outside parliament- must be identified, isolated and ostracised by the entire civilised world that respect difference and diversity. Most democratising societies have laws that criminalise purveyors of hate and incitement of hatred against a person, persons or communities; and have robust bill of rights that protect citizens and minorities. Uganda should not be an exception.

However, it is not surprising that the state should be seeking such kind of personal control, to the extent of wanting to police what people do in their bedrooms, and who else they do it with and whether their partners are of the skirt or trouser wearing sorts.

First, this comes about because of the nature and character of the Ugandan state: it is a military dictatorship that shot its way to and kept itself in power by military force. What there is in terms of a fledgling parliamentary democracy is sheer gloss of veneer for the consumption of the democratic tourist. For twenty years it outlawed political parties and suppressed freedoms of association and assembly, and the press is routinely knuckled. It rules by decree, not through free and open, well-informed debate in a deliberative, democratic process.  Therefore, like all autocrats, the Ugandan ruling clique is not about to deviate from the age-old practice of control and micromanagement of all the affairs of state, and particularly the censorship and directing of the thoughts and behaviour of its citizens. Control freaks love uniformity but are threatened by freedom, diversity, and difference.

The second reason why the hate campaign against GLBT is not surprising is that most of those connected to state power, for instance Nsaba Buturo & Co. are born-again, rigid, fundamentalist, revivalist Christians who bring to the public policy process and the management of state affairs, their religious bigotry that they pass off as public morality and ethics.  They completely ignore the fact that although Uganda is a majority Christian nation-state, there are people of other faiths, as well as non-believers, to whom the Muslim and Christian moralities they are so quick to refer to, cannot and should not apply. In any case, the Ugandan state is separate from the Church or Mosque, and it would be prudent for public servants to refrain from using and imposing the teachings and morals of one religion on the diverse people of Uganda, with pluralities of religion, faith, spiritual and moral inclinations.

Lucima warns:

It is not scientific, but a cursory observation would reveal that societies that have fewer sexual, social and personal taboos, have made tremendous progress and have shown greater imagination, ingenuity, innovations and inventiveness among their population. They cherish freedom of thought and respect civil liberties. Conversely, societies such as Uganda, where one man is in charge of awarding market tenders from Rukingiri to Lira and his word is the law; or where vice chancellors or chancellors of national universities are political appointees rather than meritorious  professionals recognised in their fields and elevated by a professional body and academic peers, the degree of restrictions on personal freedoms and civil liberties have direct relationships with the state of scientific research, social development, ingenuity, curiosity and intellectual debate on matters of public policy and interest.

Christian Rightists threaten to condemn Uganda to a permanent state of irrational and backward barbarism. But they threaten to do the same here in the United States, where people like Rick Warren make no apology for supporting such barbarism — and where U.S. taxpayers continue to fund this barbarism in the name of humanitarian aid and disease prevention.

Meanwhile, Exodus International — whose board member Don Schmierer co-launched the campaign for this bill — refuses to issue a press release formally condemning the death-penalty campaign and the four U.S. and Ugandan ex-gay activists who recklessly provoked it. Aside from a less-than-authoritative prayer for someone, somebody else preferably, to maybe do something, spokesman Randy Thomas offered no assistance to those who, like conservative Christian Warren Throckmorton, are campaigning to stop the legislation.

If you live in the United States, please contact your Congressperson and Senator TODAY. Ask them to join their colleagues Tammy Baldwin, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, and others in challenging federal aid to Uganda until this foreign aid is made contingent upon specific gains in health education and human rights.